BabestationX & Live Shows - Chat & Discussion

Does the "B" in bsx stand for "beth?"

No it stands for bollocks (as in this channel is now utter.....).

(11-08-2014 07:05 )SCIROCCO Wrote:  No it stands for bollocks (as in this channel is now utter.....).

Couldn't have put better myself! LOL

This review's a little late as I'm not online every day, but I thought Jada was very good on Saturday night. I mean very good in the sense that I'm sure all Jada fans would have been pleased. A very vigorous performance from her and I've got to give her credit for some shows well done.

no reviews for the last 3 nights.im just assuming that they are continuing with the same tame pussy closed crap.or perhaps even no live shows at all?

(13-08-2014 01:41 )sierraman Wrote:  no reviews for the last 3 nights.im just assuming that they are continuing with the same tame pussy closed crap.or perhaps even no live shows at all?

Same old rubbish I'm afraid - even worse than usual over the last few nights if that is possible

(12-08-2014 12:45 )Mr Injecy Wrote:  I thought Jada was very good on Saturday night.

Yes a good night from Jada and it was nice to see different sets being used for each show. It's nice to see that kind of effort being made.

(13-08-2014 13:02 )Doc Holliday Wrote:  

(12-08-2014 12:45 )Mr Injecy Wrote:  I thought Jada was very good on Saturday night.

Yes a good night from Jada and it was nice to see different sets being used for each show. It's nice to see that kind of effort being made.

As a Jada fan, I'd agree, I enjoyed it.
Those looking for penetration with dildos and "spreading" etc will have been disappointed though.

My criticism - watching it via the webstream - was the lighting was too low in a couple of the sets, and that combined with variable stream quality meant the picture was often blurring and pixellating - especially when she was moving energetically, which was quite often
The spell where she was outside in the dark was a nice idea but the poor lighting spoiled it - a lot of it was either just too murky, or they were shooting straight towards a really bright floodlight which meant she was in shadow; it improved dramatically when she went back inside.

Does anyone know why the bsx webstream is worse quality than the unleashed one ? Sometimes it looks more like a Jackson Pollack painting than porn.

(13-08-2014 20:12 )M-L-L Wrote:  The spell where she was outside in the dark was a nice idea but the poor lighting spoiled it - a lot of it was either just too murky, or they were shooting straight towards a really bright floodlight which meant she was in shadow; it improved dramatically when she went back inside.

I liked the outside idea too, definitely worth a try, but you're right about the lighting.