Lolly Badcock - boobs discussion

Why on earth would you want her to ruin perfection?

(02-06-2010 14:46 )Insanity Wrote:  Lolly looking honry as ever Man I really would love to spend a night with her just wish her tits were bigger, Lolly if you read this get a titjob lmao.

Well, his name IS "Insanity". Plaudits for Light Entertainment for his eloquent post. And three cheers for Lolly for being Lolly.

You like plastic tits? Buy yourself a Barbie for Christmas.

What !, Lolly Babcock needs 'implants' somebody is talking alot a 'crap'. The vivacious,sexy and gorgeous Lolly Babcock has done quite well in the adult industry without the need for changing a thing. Her boobs maybe small but they're still very caressable and the main thing as far as I'm concerned is that they're natural !..

(15-12-2010 20:59 )Light Entertainment Wrote:  I think it's tragic that any member of the human race could be self-centred enough to start a thread like this. When you consider the lengths Lolly Badcock has gone to in order to please viewers through the course of her career, it amazes me that there'd actually be someone for whom all of that was not enough. But hey, it's a crazy world.

When someone says: "Have a boob job Lolly", maybe, to them, that's all they're saying. But I'd urge anyone who considers making a remark like that to think beyond their own momentary whims for a while and look at the implications. In full, what the remark means, is: "Have a boob job Lolly. Go on - spend several grand of your own money, endure the pain, risk your health, risk your appearance and thus your future income... on the off chance that it might inject that little bit more novelty into my next couple of wanks." Doesn't sound quite such a fair suggestion now, does it?

Actually, despite my inability to comprehend it, I'm glad the thread is here, because it does give me a chance to a) reiterate the overwhelmingly held view that Lolly is physically better than perfect and can't be improved upon, and b) introduce the notion that actually, there are loads of us out here who recognise that beauty encompasses everything a girl is - not just the physical elements.

Lolly Badcock is one of the brightest and most charming characters who ever set foot on a babeshow. She doesn't have 'off nights', and she never performs at anything less than 100%. She's both the most explosive performer, and the sweetest, most diplomatic presenter, all in one stunningly beautiful package. For a legend of her standing, she's also unbelievably modest, constantly referring to herself not as a "porn star", but as a "porn girl". Ironic, given that if Lolly Badcock isn't a star, I can't imagine who the hell would be. But it does say something about about how this amazing girl sees herself, and it's why instead of making absurd implied criticisms we should be drumming home the blatant fact that she's one of the hottest, most glamourous, and most lovable TV stars on the planet. Thankfully, that's what the vast, vast majority are saying. Oh yeah, and she has fantastic tits.

Wow, talk about save a ho!! Jeez.

Lolly Badcock is a babeshow natural. She makes doing a night show look easy and never loses her authenticity of look or performance. Her boobs are great as they are as is the rest of her. I take the view that if she keeps her body natural the feel of her performance will follow suit. If she goes in any way artificial then I would perhaps, rightly or wrongly view her performance in a different light and I would rather continue to love what she does and the way she does it just as I do now. She has charm, versatility, adaptability, personality, style, sex appeal and dynamism but most of all she has the look of someone who genuinely loves and enjoys what she does. Her natural look helps, she looks happy in her own skin and I am more than happy with her boobs, bum, legs, feet, stomach, face, hair and everything else. If it aint broke.............

(28-12-2010 16:22 )snookered147 Wrote:  Lolly Badcock is a babeshow natural. She makes doing a night show look easy and never loses her authenticity of look or performance. Her boobs are great as they are as is the rest of her. I take the view that if she keeps her body natural the feel of her performance will follow suit. If she goes in any way artificial then I would perhaps, rightly or wrongly view her performance in a different light and I would rather continue to love what she does and the way she does it just as I do now. She has charm, versatility, adaptability, personality, style, sex appeal and dynamism but most of all she has the look of someone who genuinely loves and enjoys what she does. Her natural look helps, she looks happy in her own skin and I am more than happy with her boobs, bum, legs, feet, stomach, face, hair and everything else. If it aint broke.............

Couldn`t agree more,always smiling,never embarrassed and looks fresh as a daisy every time she is on,looooooovvvvvveeeeeerrrrrlllllyyyyy

Lolly's boobs are amazing, great size and shape. She's got a great natural body, it would be ridiculous to alter it in any way

Now come come, guys.
You're not being especially fair, any of you. Are you now? You're just shouting down insanity. A debate is one thing, but merely saying "Lolly's tits are ace!" over and over again* doesn't make for a stronger case.
Nor does shouting or saying it in a funny voice.

Personally, I think there's much mileage to be had from seeing a gorgeous naturally-endowed girl go for it and super-size her boobs.
Yes! You heard/read right. (Actually, you didn't hear at all....just read. yeh, whatever)

I am constantly mesmerised by the way a nice big/bigger/biggest pair of silicone-boosted beauts (don't) wobble about, the soft flesh gently undulating with each heaving breath... changing shape with every alteration of posture... jiggling as the girl giggles... undulating with each pendulous swing when she's on all fours and remaining totally the same shape whether she's lying on her back, sat up reading Jackanory or bungee-jumping.
I adore the way the better-than-nature melons of a surgically-improved (yes, improved, that's what I said.) (wrote. I 'wrote'. You could've just let that go ) lady-babe-chick defy the laws of nature, thus not so much enhancing her natural beauty as replacing it entirely and rendering it unnecessary. Mmmm... ladyless rack; and after all, isn't that what post-pubescent man has always dreamed of, since first he gazed up at the stars? I know I've certainly never given it consideration until now thought of little else!
Picture it - the most beautifully-designed pair of bra knackers you've ever laid eyes on, totally naked, huge and awesome. There they gleam, in the sun, totally unhindered by the addition of an inefficient Human female, but simply 50-feet plus of sheer, spherical sex, each perfect skin-clad silicone moon surmounted by a nipple the size of a fridge and set in the centre of an areola as big as a jacuzzi!
Wow! That's .... HORRIBLE!

What was I even thinking?! Sorry about all that; I must have succumbed to temporary, darn - what's the word?



*It is hypnotically entrancing to listen to though.

Missing key events. Talking bollocks. Making stuff up.
~~~SAVE THE KRILL!~~~

She has had a boob job, great!!! Going through this thread does make for some fun reading, especially that essay from Light Entertainment!!

It seems like a lot of the babes are getting boob jobs lately. Personally not my place to judge, I liked her natural but will see what she looks like when she returns. But whatever the case may be it won't put me off her, she's one of the best girls to watch and just has an aura around her that very few other girls has.