Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 25 Vote(s) - 4.32 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Babestation24 - Chat & Discussion (No Requests in this thread)

Author Message
jorrell Online
Posting Machine
*****

Posts: 1,116
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation: 20
Post: #9811
RE: Babestation24 - Chat & Discussion (No Requests in this thread)
(Yesterday 21:14 )meisterlampe1989_2.0 Wrote:  You mean the bruises? Yes, I noticed that before. Maybe she likes bondage.

Look like a lot of red spots to me, sign of really bad skincare or possibly a medical issue who knows Huh
Yesterday 21:17
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
meisterlampe1989_2.0 Online
Posting Machine
*****

Posts: 1,620
Joined: Mar 2023
Reputation: 2
Post: #9812
RE: Babestation24 - Chat & Discussion (No Requests in this thread)
(Yesterday 21:17 )jorrell Wrote:  
(Yesterday 21:14 )meisterlampe1989_2.0 Wrote:  You mean the bruises? Yes, I noticed that before. Maybe she likes bondage.

Look like a lot of red spots to me, sign of really bad skincare or possibly a medical issue who knows Huh

I thought you meant the bruises. I often noticed that she is covered in bruises from head to toe.

I don't care about red spots or something like that. I once had a girlfriend with neurodermatitis. So I can tell you something about it.
(This post was last modified: Yesterday 21:20 by meisterlampe1989_2.0.)
Yesterday 21:19
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
jorrell Online
Posting Machine
*****

Posts: 1,116
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation: 20
Post: #9813
RE: Babestation24 - Chat & Discussion (No Requests in this thread)
Standards have dropped in all aspects significantly regardless. Did Nessi buy that webcam off Temu for 10 doll hairs Surprised

Thought id give it a chance tonight, think ill go find something else to do. As per your earlier post, every newcomer has been a total waste of time. Guess they'll accept any old shit now and call it a show. My oh my eek
(This post was last modified: Yesterday 21:26 by jorrell.)
Yesterday 21:21
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
meisterlampe1989_2.0 Online
Posting Machine
*****

Posts: 1,620
Joined: Mar 2023
Reputation: 2
Post: #9814
RE: Babestation24 - Chat & Discussion (No Requests in this thread)
I always said for me the channel went downhill when they started the home shows.

Not only that the one uniqueness they have over regular internet camshows - a studio and therefore production value - is totally destroyed by it.

(Even the studio is now just a couch, anyway.)

No: Every Babe has a different camera equipment, internet connection and technical set-up. So we get eye cancer show after show.

They were forced to do homeshows when Corona entered the stage, but that they largely rely on it now is a travesty.

I guess they have to do it, because it's harder to get Babes if you demand that they always come to the studio and it's cheaper, because you don't have to pay a hotel and food and drinks for them.

Literally NOBODY is doing less than 1080p anymore. Only BS24 thinks that you can subject your viewers to this crap.
(This post was last modified: Yesterday 21:33 by meisterlampe1989_2.0.)
Yesterday 21:31
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
jorrell Online
Posting Machine
*****

Posts: 1,116
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation: 20
Post: #9815
RE: Babestation24 - Chat & Discussion (No Requests in this thread)
Thats what baffles me, 95% of cams on ANY site is 1080p standard, some even 1080@60 for fluid motion, others 4K. How can they consistently find girls who have ZERO technical knowledge AND inferior hardware/setup is beyond me when its not exactly expensive to do anymore.

Not a single home show has ever come CLOSE to the accepted standard in 2025. Amateur hour is an understatement. There's 16 yr old twitch streamers out there with superior quality and expertise and all they are doing is gaming. Throwing on a single webcam with some lighting is a cake walk but not apparently for these lot

As a producer I wouldnt have accepted ANY of this garbage quality on my channel. its beyond ridiculous Huh

Cant watch any more.. Off it goes
(This post was last modified: Yesterday 21:40 by jorrell.)
Yesterday 21:37
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
meisterlampe1989_2.0 Online
Posting Machine
*****

Posts: 1,620
Joined: Mar 2023
Reputation: 2
Post: #9816
RE: Babestation24 - Chat & Discussion (No Requests in this thread)
Don't forget that this has something to do with the connection to the studio, too.

They often had Babes on with crystal clear 1080p fluid picture quality when they were on a camsite.

As we have seen a mouse pointer before and a few days back even a computer desktop, I think they are just capturing their pc screen and converting it to the TV signal.

I am not a technician, but I think that this is the reason this looks so awful.
(This post was last modified: Yesterday 21:45 by meisterlampe1989_2.0.)
Yesterday 21:43
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
jorrell Online
Posting Machine
*****

Posts: 1,116
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation: 20
Post: #9817
RE: Babestation24 - Chat & Discussion (No Requests in this thread)
(Yesterday 21:43 )meisterlampe1989_2.0 Wrote:  Don't forget that this has something to do with the connection to the studio, too.

They often had Babes on with crytal clear 1080p fluid picture quality when they were on a camsite.

As we have seen a mouse pointer before and a few days back even a computer desktop, I think they are just capturing their pc screen and converting it to the TV signal.

I am not a technician, but I think that this is the reason this looks so awful.

Indeed I've already caught BS24 out several times with this exact sabotage but you can usually tell a recoded stream from just a bad source webcam feed (currently like Nessi's tonight. However Emma's is not too bad at all)

Divina's cam has been horrible at times and thats been pure low bitrate issue whether from the connection from her to the studio, or they themselves with bandwidth problems. Her webcam on the cam site is usually clear enough acceptable 720p even though thats below standard really.

Most of the time I think they simply dont have the lighting, the camera quality and most importantly, equipment to sufficiently encode the stream in high enough quality (1080p) as this takes huge CPU usage and causes spikes and lags on low/mid range laptops/pc's, Only gamers or people with systems with dedicated graphic cards can utilise their inbuilt NVENC encoder to handle the task easily.

BUT that said, a mid range laptop or PC ifrom the last 5 years is more than capable of handling 1080p if you know what your doing. Hell, most smartphones can handle it!

No more than 6000 kbps is required to send a perfectly crystal clear 1080p signal, but do BS24 have sufficient bandwidth to handle two of these AND upload back out to satellite and webstream at times? need 30/40mbps upload minimum. Maybe why we always see this garbage and even Charlene has mentioned they suffer from low bitrate often suggesting they havent!
(This post was last modified: Yesterday 21:57 by jorrell.)
Yesterday 21:50
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
jorrell Online
Posting Machine
*****

Posts: 1,116
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation: 20
Post: #9818
RE: Babestation24 - Chat & Discussion (No Requests in this thread)
They will have 2 incoming webcam streams, then use a blank canvas with whatever software they use most likely OBS (thats why you sometimes see their mouse cursor, even though any moron knows how to hide that!) then add the graphics and then encode that out to both the webstream and satellite. So they need sufficient bandwidth for 2 source in and 2 encoded out.

Large cam sites have more than sufficient resources to handle this, BS24 does not nor will they have their own ingest server as a third party handling the load
(This post was last modified: Yesterday 22:07 by jorrell.)
Yesterday 22:04
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
meisterlampe1989_2.0 Online
Posting Machine
*****

Posts: 1,620
Joined: Mar 2023
Reputation: 2
Post: #9819
RE: Babestation24 - Chat & Discussion (No Requests in this thread)
They should have taken care of this as soon as they decided to heavily rely on home shows. But I guess they didn't have the budget to do it... or they simply don't care.
(This post was last modified: Yesterday 22:08 by meisterlampe1989_2.0.)
Yesterday 22:08
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
jorrell Online
Posting Machine
*****

Posts: 1,116
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation: 20
Post: #9820
RE: Babestation24 - Chat & Discussion (No Requests in this thread)
(Yesterday 22:08 )meisterlampe1989_2.0 Wrote:  They should have taken care of this as soon as they decided to heavily rely on home shows. But I guess they didn't have the budget to do it... or they simply don't care.

Think your right on both counts, the simply dont care AND it costs money, we know that with them moving to a new studio space with just a sofa. They also cut the bandwidth requirements for satellite reducing the resolution lets not forget!

Talking of which, someone needs to hire the cleaners because the last studio show i TRIED to watch with Christy which was a total disaster, the camera kept focusing on her shoes for some reason and you can see all the accumulated dust that's built up already under the sofa space! Big Laugh
(This post was last modified: Yesterday 22:14 by jorrell.)
Yesterday 22:09
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply