Lacey Lorenzo - Chat & Discussion

I still think they have guts to do nude photo shoots practically out in the open like that! Sure it's on the roof, and relatively far away, but all it takes is one complaint, and you could have a criminal record for public indecency. If someone is really offended by it, then don't the police have to follow the law, and go forward with some type of charge? I mean, anyone could film this from their window and have it as evidence.

For the most part, this seems rather safe if they have a quick look around at the nearby buildings, and make the shoot quick, but it's still a risk. London is different than Spain!

Maybe the trees are there after a complaint, to help hide the women?

If that is indeed outdoors I imagine the studios have permits or licenses for outdoor photoshoots. And I'd bet this can easily be considered "art" if some jerkoff decides to complain. Public nudity for fun = bad. Public nudity for the sake of "art" = accepted.

^^^ Apparently the Cellcast/BS building is out of the jurisdiction of UK regulations, it has been given Dutch diplomatic immunity and comes under the jurisdiction of Dutch nudity laws/regulations just like their channels, tis true honest

Yeah, I heard someone from that building in the distance got killed falling out a window.

Apparently he survived the fall then got hit on the head by a huge telephoto lens

(05-07-2012 05:43 )oklahoma001 Wrote:  If that is indeed outdoors I imagine the studios have permits or licenses for outdoor photoshoots. And I'd bet this can easily be considered "art" if some jerkoff decides to complain. Public nudity for fun = bad. Public nudity for the sake of "art" = accepted.

Anyone giving them a license for "Art", would likely know what company they worked for, and I don't hear of many permits being given for nudity out in the open. In buildings, yes sometimes, but not on rooftops for anyone to see. Maybe it's something where you must not be near anyone else in order to do this, and must not be in clear vicinity of children or drawing too much attention to yourself? I don't know. Some of the past pics of Priya and Preeti seemed a bit daring as well. The British tend to either be very lenient (Put your close on now, or risk being arrested) on public nudity, or very strict (instant arrest and a criminal record). 50/50 chance!

(05-07-2012 02:02 )mrmann Wrote:  I still think they have guts to do nude photo shoots practically out in the open like that! Sure it's on the roof, and relatively far away, but all it takes is one complaint, and you could have a criminal record for public indecency.

This has been discussed before. To be public indecency it has to be visible from the public highway. I seriously doubt that anyone in the street would be able to see what was happening on that roof.

(06-07-2012 09:03 )BarrieBF Wrote:  

(05-07-2012 02:02 )mrmann Wrote:  I still think they have guts to do nude photo shoots practically out in the open like that! Sure it's on the roof, and relatively far away, but all it takes is one complaint, and you could have a criminal record for public indecency.

This has been discussed before. To be public indecency it has to be visible from the public highway. I seriously doubt that anyone in the street would be able to see what was happening on that roof.

By that logic, I could stand on the roof of a company I work for (With the permition of my coworkers etc), right on the same street, completely nude and with other building windows within relative close proximity, and I won't get arrested? Not even if the nice little old lady across the way complains?? Cool, off I go to do just that

I thought the exposure of genitals was illegal in the UK? Also, the poses are for the purpose of sexual arrousal, so that's what I find confusing about the laws.

Loving this lady, Is their any more of her floating about on the net?

Lacey does cam shows.
[attachment=36139]

Lacey was great on extreme last night, didn't hold anything back.