Matsui
Senior Poster
Posts: 287
Joined: Feb 2009
Reputation: 9
|
RE: Babestation on Freeview channel 33
vila Wrote:In the opening post in Candy’s thread, which I’ve only just discovered, in the Partyland section she says that it’s Freeview who are setting different rules. Now why the heck couldn’t the Cellcast members on here tell us that when we’ve been screaming to be told? The only reply I got from one of them (in a PM) actually claimed that all the channels were operating under the same rules, which we all know isn’t true.
However, this puts a whole new light on everything. We could, in theory, have an ally in Ofcom rather than an adversary. Freeview was set up specifically to provide access to material which people without satellite or cable facilities are otherwise unable to receive. They are supposed to be merely a medium for distributing programming material which is produced elsewhere. If they are interfering with the content of that product, or requiring others to do so, before they relay it, then I believe it can be claimed that they are in dereliction of the duty they were set up to perform and are breaching the human rights of the people who are being denied access to material which is freely available to others.
Ofcom is the body with the responsibility for setting broadcasting standards, not Freeview. I feel sure that Ofcom therefore have the power to order Freeview to accept programming for onward transmission unchanged provided that it conforms to Ofcom rules. I’m sure this must be true although if it is I can’t understand why Cellcast haven’t gone down that route. Maybe they’re afraid that Freeview have the dosh to hire hotshot lawyers who they can't win against.
I can’t see the whole "Freeview are doing it" thing to be true, Ofcom are the ones appointed by the government to set broadcasting rules for television no one else, why would "Freeview" or by it’s company name DTV Services undermine a Government appointed body like that?
Another point is if that is the case why is it fine to show something like Sexcetera, which is a lot more raunchy than anything on the babe channels, which is basically hardcore porn minus any penetration shots? Then there is the whole PG thing which never got pulled even when it got to it's most risque.
I mean no one can lauch a new channel, change an existing one or fart on Freeview with out Ofcom approval, yet somehow they can set their own broadcasting standards? No I don’t believe this story, I reckon it’s something put out by the producers to get rid of some of the flak they are getting.
Matsui's Favourite Babe Show Beauties, Past and Present
Tiffany Chambers | Kandi Kay | Jada | Tori Lee | Georgie Darby | Lolly Badcock | Charlene Hart | Olivia Berzinc | Caty Cole | Madison Rose | Jess West | Kimberley Jones
(This post was last modified: 09-06-2009 00:27 by Matsui.)
|
|
09-06-2009 00:24 |
|
Censorship :-(
Sadly, no more caps. :-(
Posts: 5,362
Joined: May 2009
Reputation: 52
|
RE: Display problems on Freeview channel 33
vila Wrote:But while it is still interrupted by BS Lite it can't be top dog can it? I forgot to watch the web stream this morning as the 5am finish line was crossed, to see if the usual transformation took place in Amanda but I suspect it did because as the Freeview picture faded it looked as if she was just in the act of scrambling up onto her knees and scrabbling about with her fingers in places she hadn't touched previously.
Edit: Having said that I thought last night was a bit of an improvement although Paige, after giving a quite erotic first section inexplicably went very quiet for the second.
The highlight for me, of course, was Yvette quoting one one my posts!
I suspect these posts are going to get moved (sorry, The Watcher, it’s vila’s fault ), but one last comment - Last night seemed noticeably poorer than the previous night; Yvette, who was on both nights, was more subdued; Amanda, I've already mentioned. Morgan was the best, as she at least gave plenty of semi-decent ass views, which, until very recently, was content that has been almost entrely absent from BS Lite. One step forward (the night before), at least 2 steps back (last night), I would say.
Still, at least Morgan wore some shoes, for a change
BTW, when did Yvette quote your post? (I have tended to FFWD through BS Lite, searching, often in vain, for signs of improvement).
{You're correct, I have moved them. - TheWatcher}
|
|
09-06-2009 00:28 |
|
Censorship :-(
Sadly, no more caps. :-(
Posts: 5,362
Joined: May 2009
Reputation: 52
|
RE: Display problems on Freeview channel 33
vila Wrote:But while it is still interrupted by BS Lite it can't be top dog can it? I forgot to watch the web stream this morning as the 5am finish line was crossed, to see if the usual transformation took place in Amanda but I suspect it did because as the Freeview picture faded it looked as if she was just in the act of scrambling up onto her knees and scrabbling about with her fingers in places she hadn't touched previously.
Edit: Having said that I thought last night was a bit of an improvement although Paige, after giving a quite erotic first section inexplicably went very quiet for the second.
The highlight for me, of course, was Yvette quoting one one my posts!
Edit 2:
Censorship :-( Wrote:Actually, PL has had MUCH better g/g action, usually on the weekend shows - they actually touch/caress one another, brush tits together, brush tits on ass etc. Not exactly hardcore, but light-years ahead of BS Lite's pitiful attempt.
They were last night too. I kept the web stream on all night. Reede and Sarah Dee (is that her name?) were being very touchy-feely.
Damn you! You've forced me to make another OT post
I think you mean Sammi.
|
|
09-06-2009 00:35 |
|
Censorship :-(
Sadly, no more caps. :-(
Posts: 5,362
Joined: May 2009
Reputation: 52
|
RE: Display problems on Freeview channel 33
vila Wrote:Hmmm - we'll have to agree to disagree there I think. I enjoyed Paige's first stint, although I'd have enjoyed it a lot more if I could've made a decent recording of it.
Not sure these will be moved - the subject is effectively closed now, isn't it? Unless we can get back the auto-switching for the ratio, but that would be just icing on the cake.
Edit: Yeah, Sammi, that's her - saucy little blonde thing.
Each to their own, I say.
As for closing the topic, probably, but I wonder if those who claimed to have an undistorted picture, will now post to try and find out how to ‘correct’ their set-up to display the ‘corrected’ broadcast, ‘correctly’?
|
|
09-06-2009 00:44 |
|