Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 50 Vote(s) - 2.86 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Ofcom proposing to get much tougher ?

Author Message
mrwotzup Offline
...---...
*****

Posts: 11,162
Joined: Dec 2008
Reputation: 223
Post: #11
RE: Ofcom proposing to get much tougher ?
DT17 Wrote:Cos the 900 channels are much easier targets with less mainstream exposure & a much less publically open support? OFCOM have to justify their existance somehow & its far easier to kill the small guy than go after the terrestial big boys & the potential headlines/backlash that may involve. No one would batter an eyelid if the 900s disappeared. Sad but true.
Good point
The problem is that the headline " Ofcom cracking down on sex Channels" plays very well in newspapers like the Daily Mail and its readers,they can bring huge support to such measures,lobby MPs etc.

They think any kind of nudity (phone sex eek) etc is perverted,dirty,digusting and want to ban it...they think anyone who views it is some kind of sex maniac/pervert/potential rapist/deviant... So if they read Ofcom are banning it then they think its a good idea....It will show to the Daily Mail type reader that Ofcom are making a difference in protecting the morals of the Nation

As DT17 said who is going to stand up for a phone sex channel, I dont think your local MP is going to help you so the 900 channels are easy targets,no Newspaper is going to run a campaign to save them

We are all doomed

(btw Its almost the same way they report Computer Games.... spawn of the Devil...dont get me started)
19-06-2009 18:55
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Rammyrascal Offline
Team Thicc
*****

Posts: 102,140
Joined: Apr 2009
Reputation: 250
Post: #12
RE: Ofcom proposing to get much tougher ?
YEP WERE ALL DOOMED RUN FOR YOUR LIVES !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! lol

a member of the Piper Niven Cult
19-06-2009 19:29
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
StanTheMan Offline
Banned

Posts: 3,790
Joined: May 2009
Post: #13
RE: Ofcom proposing to get much tougher ?
Dreamlander Wrote:Ofcom,if you're listening,PIN protect us and F*ck Off!

That's one of the greatest sentences ever! It sums up the whole argument in just ten words Big Grin
(This post was last modified: 19-06-2009 19:32 by StanTheMan.)
19-06-2009 19:32
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Hollywood PillowPants Offline
p.W.o 4 LIFE!!!
****

Posts: 924
Joined: Feb 2009
Reputation: 60
Post: #14
RE: Ofcom proposing to get much tougher ?
They will never ban the babechannels,the authorities in this country are all about the money,they'll come up with ridiculous guidelines that are next to impossible to follow,and fine their asses to the nth degree.On a lighter note i can see a future where ofcum have motion cameras stationed above the beds,more than three groin thrusts per minute is too sexual FINED four booty shakes per minute is too provoking FINED boobs that move more than 2mm is deemed as corrupting the moral fabric of society FINED.The future is bright,The future is filming from the neck up!!

""This show's about as interesting as Nick Griffin reading excerpts from 'Mein Kampf'!"
19-06-2009 19:55
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Chilly Away
Posting Machine
*****

Posts: 7,577
Joined: Dec 2008
Reputation: 161
Post: #15
RE: Ofcom proposing to get much tougher ?
Yep, burqa babes will be coming soon!
19-06-2009 20:00
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
moron50 Away
Master Poster
****

Posts: 868
Joined: Sep 2008
Reputation: 71
Post: #16
RE: Ofcom proposing to get much tougher ?
Perhaps Angel Long could blow them all, or provide the requisite lady/lady action to ensure that they shut the f**k up.

Alternatively, get a newspaper to publish their expenses, which one can only assume would include copious numbers of claims for branded tissues.
19-06-2009 20:06
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Hollywood PillowPants Offline
p.W.o 4 LIFE!!!
****

Posts: 924
Joined: Feb 2009
Reputation: 60
Post: #17
RE: Ofcom proposing to get much tougher ?
mrwotzup Wrote:...they think anyone who views it is some kind of sex maniac/pervert/potential rapist/deviant...

ERM.... should i be worried? with the exception of potential rapist,i qualify for the other three. Big Grin

""This show's about as interesting as Nick Griffin reading excerpts from 'Mein Kampf'!"
19-06-2009 20:12
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
*Kal-El* Away
Superman
*****

Posts: 37,693
Joined: Jul 2008
Reputation: 303
Post: #18
RE: Ofcom proposing to get much tougher ?
i think ofcom are gonna get so hard on the channels that we'll be lucky if they even allow the models to show there ankles lol.

"No Clark I know Everything About You, I Didn’t Just Borrow Your DNA, I Have All Your Memories All Your Thoughts......Every Last Twisted One of Them”.
19-06-2009 20:30
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
steven6 Offline
I'm Orange
*****

Posts: 5,324
Joined: Jul 2008
Reputation: 82
Post: #19
RE: Ofcom proposing to get much tougher ?
This is pish you can't see anything more explicit on the babe channels than you would on sexcetera

I wish I could go back in time and kill whoever invented Breast Implants!!!!!!
19-06-2009 22:04
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
seth Offline
Master Poster
****

Posts: 650
Joined: Jun 2009
Reputation: 24
Post: #20
RE: Ofcom proposing to get much tougher ?
steven6 Wrote:This is pish you can't see anything more explicit on the babe channels than you would on sexcetera

I'd say Sexcetera's more explicit.
19-06-2009 22:13
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply