Ultramantis Black
Account Closed
Posts: 403
Joined: Jul 2009
|
RE: Question time with the Babestation Boss.
(09-04-2015 08:48 )Tractor boy Wrote: To have a starlets show work they need to find some new talent, the last three signings bs have made are Candy, Dannii & Jenna, all established girls. It is a worrying trend with bs, where will the channel be in ten years time, will we have a 40 year old Lori on screen waving her phone and shouting, I certainly hope not. With the demise of lads mags and page 3 there should be plenty of fresh faces for bs to sign up.
I just posted this in another thread, but they had the chance to find new girls with Apprentice. For whatever reason, the majority weren't given a go and the producers stuck to using the same girls that had been on the shows for years (Lolly, Tiffany, Jada, Charlene Hart etc). It could have been a steady source for them to constantly bring in new girls and refresh the shows. As it is, you're left with a whole host of girls who it feels like have been doing the channels for the best part of a decade. As has been said, even the 'new' girls are hardly new.
|
|
09-04-2015 13:09 |
|
RUsure
Senior Poster
Posts: 104
Joined: Apr 2013
Reputation: 4
|
RE: Question time with the Babestation Boss.
This is more of a rhetorical question, but please do feel free to ask the Boss, anyway:
Is it true that your entire philosophy on life is to leech-off / blood suck your fellow man, with no concern whatsoever as to whether your hosts benefit in any way??… Because that is the obvious conclusion that I have drawn from the very many years of viewing the output of this channel. If your answer is, no!; then, whilst this may pull the wool over the eyes of many here, it certainly will not delude the insightful. Due to the fact that night after night, after night, we have evidence to the contrary, in which censorship clearly plays no part in the miserable output of this channel.
Here is a philosophy that may work wonders with your fellow man whilst at the same time in no way affecting your earnings potential: Before any action, ask yourself this question - would I really be happy if it were I at the receiving end…? And then act accordingly … The fact that the world is full of injustice and corruption does not mitigate the deliberately frustrating, petty, nasty-minded no-shows that the public are being subjected to, night after night.
There is no reason whatsoever that you cannot be considerate of your hosts (the viewing public) without in any way detracting from their interest to purchase other material if they are already so inclined... Of course, if one possesses a sadistic bent, then one will in no way be inclined to satisfy the well wishes of their host.
(This post was last modified: 09-04-2015 15:00 by RUsure.)
|
|
09-04-2015 14:12 |
|
amy1
Senior Poster
Posts: 393
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 19
|
RE: Question time with the Babestation Boss.
(09-04-2015 14:12 )RUsure Wrote: This is more of a rhetorical question, but please do feel free to ask the Boss, anyway:
Is it true that your entire philosophy on life is to leech-off / blood suck your fellow man, with no concern whatsoever as to whether your hosts benefit in any way??… Because that is the obvious conclusion that I have drawn from the very many years of viewing the output of this channel. If your answer is, no!; then, whilst this may pull the wool over the eyes of many here, it certainly will not delude the insightful. Due to the fact that night after night, after night, we have evidence to the contrary, in which censorship clearly plays no part in the miserable output of this channel
Here is a philosophy that may work wonders with your fellow man whilst at the same time in no way affect your earnings potential: Before any action, ask yourself this question - would I really be happy if it were I at the receiving end…? And then act accordingly … The fact that the world is full of injustice and corruption does not mitigate the deliberately frustrating, petty, nasty-minded no-shows that the public are being subjected to, night after night.
There is no reason whatsoever that you cannot be considerate of your hosts (the viewing public) without in any way detracting from their interest to purchase other material if they are already so inclined...Of course, if one possesses a sadistic bent, then one will in no way be inclined to satisfy the well wishes of their host.
Well put. It does seem lately that they have been providing an automated phonecall (get in get off-as they say) rather than offering a service to please the customer.
And the more desperate the girls seem on the mic, "short calls" "listen in" "i'll tell you how i like it" "quickfire round". It really puts me off from calling, i want the girls attention, i want some setup not some scripted spiel that they dole out to every john that calls.
|
|
09-04-2015 14:22 |
|