Where do you think newspapers get all the dirt on Z-listers you have never heard of and what has this to do with the Babeshows?
My job is a database administrator, and one of them I support is used by many news organisations to hold details of people that might be of interest, especially if they do something that makes them newsworthy. (It is referred to colloquially as the Zlist database)
Well almost all the girls who appear on the shows are monitored, and things like photos, tweets, statuses on various websites (including Adultwork) and video clips are held on file.
What the papers do with it is their responsibility, but many of them apply a rating to every item, and that rating will decide how the papers describe them if they need a news item. Some even have researchers who will log onto the girls webshows etc to see what they get up to and add details to the databases.
What the girls don't realise is that they might regard themselves as models, but they might end up being called porn stars or even escorts if they ever get onto the news pages. Some of the main culprits are papers that show pictures of the girls as part of their feature element.
At a meeting yesterday about possible changes with reps of various papers, I was made aware how some papers treat the information.
Something that is now being recorded is pervecam activity. If they actively participate it might be recorded as "masturbated on screen for profit" and thus they are in the porn star category.
Girls are generally lazy about their Adultwork status. They might not realise that it could indicate they do escorting, even if they would never do so.
Generally most of what we would call soft porn (non-contact, but revealing genitals) only affects status if appeared-in more than once
Generally a girl that keeps her thong on at all times and doesn't appear in "dodgy" videos would still be a model. A girl that appears full frontal, but doesn't expose pussy will be a model. Girls that appear on webshows exposing genital etc. will be classed as porn stars
Any girl that appears in a video that includes G/G with any genital contact by any party (licking, masterbation, fingering, dildo etc) B/G where an erect penis is shown or any one which features ejaculation or penetration automatically puts them into the Porn catagory, as does most S&M type activity.
After the meeting I had a bit of maintenance to do on the database so looked up several girls I like (or in one case knew) and was suprised at the results:
For example I would have all these as occupation = model, but according to two of the red tops use of the database:
Adele Taylor = Porn Star: Because she has appeared naked in Brazzers videos she would be reported, by most organisations that use the database, as a porn star, even though she always disappeared before the "real action" took place, and has never, as far as I can see, shown pussy. I have thought she has always been somewhat reserved in what she does.
Flick Hill = Porn Star/Escort: Her adultwork profile indicates she might meet punters - possibly lazy editing, so would be reported as an escort. However her antics on the pervecam recently, and her nude appearances in the Lady Voyeur videos have her slotted in the porn star bracket.(I was quite surprised when I saw a pervcam video of her on file!)
Becky Perry = Porn Star: the number of videos for various companies, where she spreads her pussy lips and inserts a finger puts her in the porn star category.
So if a girl wants to be reported as a model she should be careful of how far she is prepared to go, knowing that everything can be seen nowadays.
Having said that if a girl isn't too worried - then go for it - but if they do things that will cause then to be recorded as porn stars then they might as well go the whole hog