StanTheMan
Banned
Posts: 3,790
Joined: May 2009
|
RE: Amy Williams
(13-08-2009 23:19 )Digital Dave Wrote: Yes, it's odd that Amy would associate herself with the new 960 which sounds like it'll be every bit as shit as the old 960 (can't wait!!).
It depends how you define the word 'shit', though. You never knew what you were going to get with Chatback and I, for one, loved that aspect of its unprofessionalism. True, most of that time what we got was, quite literally, nothing, but then there were times when we had Juliette and Laura Michaels giving us hands-down-knicker, authentic pussy rubbing, the likes of which we hadn't seen since former sub channel SportXXX went fta. Then there was the dayshows; Amy wearing the skimpiest of knickers and gyrating like there was no tomorrow. Mad April fondling her tits resulting in more than several nipple flashes (and on one occassion a wholly intentional one).
No, I know Chatback was run badly, but I don't understand this universal dislike of the channel. I like a channel that chances its arm, pushes the boundaries, refuses to kowtow to Ofcom... and Chatback did this.
I personally hope this is the return of Chatback, and if it's run the same way as before, all the better. The last thing I want is another fucking Dullstation... sorry, I mean Babestation clone.
(This post was last modified: 14-08-2009 16:52 by StanTheMan.)
|
|
14-08-2009 16:49 |
|
StanTheMan
Banned
Posts: 3,790
Joined: May 2009
|
RE: Amy Williams
(14-08-2009 18:06 )Stevie Wrote: Not often I agree with one of your posts Stan but this is an exception!
Well that'll do for me, Stevie
|
|
14-08-2009 18:11 |
|