Rebecca Kelly - Tease/Night Show S66 - Chat & Discussion (Only)

With some encouragement and support I think Rebecca will eventually fell comfortable to go topless

(09-07-2017 23:44 )jimmyt73 Wrote:  Im not going to trade posts with you Mr Rascal,i will simply repeat what ive always maintained,A televised nightshow needs visual intent to justify the cost of providing it,Rebecca is just the latest in a long list of babes who may well get calls but the visual intent is not really ever going to be there making televising these type of shows feel misleading in my view

i do agree visual intent/stimulation is needed. but you & mrmann are clearly not getting what the shows are about so ill say again. THEY MAINLY ABOUT PHONE SEX AND NOT MAINLY ABOUT VISUAL STIMULATION!!!! THEY NEED TO MAKE MONEY AND THEY DO THAT BY BRINGING IN THE CALLS!!!!!!!!! and not on as you & mrmann insist mainly visual stimulation. Rebecca's stats will justify the show and not what amount of flesh she shows

doesn't matter one jot what amount of flesh is shown as far as Rebecca or S66 are concerned. what they are most concerned about is the amount of calls Rebecca is bringing in on her tease/nightshows as long as her stats are good enough, s66 will keep on having Rebecca on doing tease/nightshow. the amount of flesh she shows wont matter one bit in determining her doing tease/nightshows

(09-07-2017 23:10 )Robot Devil Wrote:  And, in the manner of Danica or Alice G - in the past - she's certainly got the attention of the forum. I thought it was a step in the right direction. She's getting there. Slowly, but surely.

^ This has just become the modus operandi these days though hasn't it. Eveeeerrrtrythinnnnmnggg is drawn out to its maximum possible tolerance. The denial involved definitely creates word of mouth on here, it satisfies those that are into such things on their calls, and it drives business towards other platforms offering more revealing angles in return for more spends... It is just seen as the best way of working to maximise return evidently.

Crucially for the individual babe it can create scope for an enticing sense of progression about her shows (especially from the 'naughty day babe' so prevalent on 66's roster). Even if she intends to renege on it, there is the evocation of promise of more to come that encourages repeat business.

More specifically... I don't have too much issue with a babe deciding that a tease hour (or hours) will not feature her nips. There is enough room, as hops says, for this on the shows - just.

What is more concerning I feel, and this has always been the case with these formalised tease sessions, is that they present a case for the continued erosion of the nighttime hours and what they traditionally represent. The more guys accept tease as standard nighttime fare the more the non-nip thing will encroach further into the night and into more sessions. There has to be the consideration that we are witnessing an agenda here, one aimed at creating further space for monetization of visuals. In essence its about standardising a 'lesser' VFM in terms of what the mainstream caller can expect to see for his buck alongside any appeal to more niche audiences.

Unfortunately the operators seem all too aware that the 'oh well, it was good while it lasted' is the de facto response of the babeshow fan to such things. Too many are just so willing to accept less and less from their shows it seems.

A babe of Rebecca's class stepping up to nights is always to be hugely welcomed particularly after such a barren spell for such things. She looked stunning and positively demanded attention tonight. She shone out like a beacon against so much mediocrity and familiarity elsewhere; but the central problem with her show for me was that the outfit was simply more than she could handle. Its awesomeness was foiled with such constant regularity of tugging to stop slips, that she finally resorted to holding the damn thing in place for long periods of limited moves... That is not tease it is just awkwardness. Any sense of sexual availability or ongoing allure is badly damaged by such things IMO. And how can a babeshow function without these?

(10-07-2017 00:13 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  i do agree visual intent/stimulation is needed. but you & mrmann are clearly not getting what the shows are about so ill say again. THEY MAINLY ABOUT PHONE SEX AND NOT MAINLY ABOUT VISUAL STIMULATION!!!! THEY NEED TO MAKE MONEY AND THEY DO THAT BY BRINGING IN THE CALLS!!!!!!!!! and not on as you & mrmann insist mainly visual stimulation. Rebecca's stats will justify the show and not what amount of flesh she shows

doesn't matter one jot what amount of flesh is shown as far as Rebecca or S66 are concerned. what they are most concerned about is the amount of calls Rebecca is bringing in on her tease/nightshows as long as her stats are good enough, s66 will keep on having Rebecca on doing tease/nightshow. the amount of flesh she shows wont matter one bit in determining her doing tease/nightshows

Problem is that suppose the amount of money she generates is not enough to cover the cost of televising it,if what you say is correct and it calls over quality then surely using the wrong babe for the timeslot although good in the short term is hardly likely to be sustainable long term.only a theory though not FACT!!!!!

They can call it what they like, a tease show, a mini night show but it was still lame. Dont get me wrong, I think Rebecca is stunning but after 10pm we expect and deserve more and a few flashes of her nipple and a skimpy outfit simply dont cut it. If she's not comfortable showing more then that's her choice but dont hog perfectly good air time after 10 when there are plenty of other gorgeous girls who will reveal more and be more provocative than Rebecca.

Infact I think it has a detrimental effect on Rebecca's popularity as my opinion of her has gone seriously downhill since she started doing tease/night shows. I certainly won't be calling her day or night anymore.

Hey guys let's give a bit of praise where it's due.Becky has been amazing over the last 12 months on S66, blossoming from a fairly shy solely-day girl to an accomplished day & tease performer on both the early & late shifts.
Apart from being astonishingly attractive she is amusing, humble, genuine & such a rarity, listens & interacts with not just her callers but most who tweet her. I'm a converted free loader after many years as she is so good to call.
She has been brave enough to do 3 late Tease shows over the last few weeks, progressing with ever more daring outfits. In addition to seamed stockings & last week's amazing booty special (sexy sec in sheer tights, my personal fave), we saw an incredible outfit last night for 2 whole hours.
Ok she doesn't get those incredible boobies fully out but there is still so much to admire with her amazing cleevage, gorgeous pins & booty & drop-dead gorgeous face.
I for one get totally bored when the nite girls get naked within 60 seconds & normally either nod or turn off.
The point is though, I don't go slagging those girls off. Similarly with feet fans, which I've never got, but it's each to their own. So why do the noisy minority slate her for sticking to her guns & (just about) keeping covered up?
Lets encourage her before she stops Teasing altogether, you never know, one day she may just surprise us all anyway!

(10-07-2017 07:40 )devils_avacado Wrote:  They can call it what they like, a tease show, a mini night show but it was still lame. Dont get me wrong, I think Rebecca is stunning but after 10pm we expect and deserve more and a few flashes of her nipple and a skimpy outfit simply dont cut it. If she's not comfortable showing more then that's her choice but dont hog perfectly good air time after 10 when there are plenty of other gorgeous girls who will reveal more and be more provocative than Rebecca.

Infact I think it has a detrimental effect on Rebecca's popularity as my opinion of her has gone seriously downhill since she started doing tease/night shows. I certainly won't be calling her day or night anymore.

Your loss mate. Surely there is room for a Teaser as there are numerous other channels all showing wall to wall (mind-numbing IMO ) total nudity right from the off. Surely there's a couple of hours available to cater for a bit of class like Becky?

I really enjoyed last nights tease show by Rebecca her choice of outfit was perfect, it revealed almost everything but kept you wanting to see more, add a few nipple flashes and it was a very good show.


Sometimes less is more.

(10-07-2017 07:40 )devils_avacado Wrote:  They can call it what they like, a tease show, a mini night show but it was still lame. Dont get me wrong, I think Rebecca is stunning but after 10pm we expect and deserve more and a few flashes of her nipple and a skimpy outfit simply dont cut it. If she's not comfortable showing more then that's her choice but dont hog perfectly good air time after 10 when there are plenty of other gorgeous girls who will reveal more and be more provocative than Rebecca.

Infact I think it has a detrimental effect on Rebecca's popularity as my opinion of her has gone seriously downhill since she started doing tease/night shows. I certainly won't be calling her day or night anymore.

Given most of the comments on here have been positive about Rebecca's show last night, definately wasn't a "lame show" last night plus as I've said what will ultimately determine if it was a "lame show" will be her stats not you. Plus can't say we expect & deserve more when everyone has different expectations etc for a tease/nightshow. If Rebecca's stats are good enough then s66 will keep on having Rebecca on.

Plus as I've said already the babeshows are NOT mainly about visual stimulation including what flesh is shown by a babe. They are mainly about PHONE SEX and as long as Rebecca is good at that & therefore bringing in enough calls, then as I've said Rebecca will be on again