(28-10-2017 06:49 )babelover48 Wrote: Even so There still is a possibility that even one punch can change the whole fight and probably history has a habit of repeating itself. Takam may well relish the fact the AJ is odds on favourite and he is the underdog and that could probably make him more dangerous than we dare to think he is. Douglas was pretty much in the same position as Takam when he faced Tyson and look what happened!
Mind you ex champ Larry Holmes commented recently that Joshua certainly could have beaten Tyson at his best I'd say it was possible but would Joshua lasted 12 (or was it 15?) rounds back then when Tyson started?
I certainly do think Joshua could have despatched Berbick out in the same amount of time as Tyson did but I reckon he'd have needed to have a few more rounds to take Tyson (at his very best) out. I would say if AJ wins tonight he should step up and challenge Wilder or take on Hughie Fury or take on the Kiltschko re match. Even so at 67 Holmes still looks in good shape!!
Mike Tyson was in his prime in the run-up & when he became the youngest heavyweight champion at 21 when he beat the likes of Berbick,Spinks,Larry Holmes etc.During that period he was coached by the triage of Teddy Atlas,Kevin Rooney & his father figure Cus D'Amato (who unfortunately died before he became champ)when Tyson boxed with whats known as the 'Peek-a-boo' style of boxing behind a high a guard with lots of lateral movement not just making him a hard target to hit but set him up to throw his devastating trademark hooks & uppercuts at angles.
A lot of people said (me included)that Tyson wasn't the same fighter when he ditched long-time coaches Atlas,Rooney (who had coached since his amateur days) & instead employed yes-men & altered his style a bit where he used a lot less lateral movement making him an easier target to hit.
I admit I was as shocked as hell (like most people were)watching the Tyson-Douglas fight unfold & I heard rumours that Tyson didn't train properly (due to Tyson's hectic lifestyle out of the ring)for the fight believing he would blow Douglas away in a few rounds.I remember Tyson blowing in the early rounds but managed to knock Douglas down in the 8th round with an uppercut described by commentators as 'like being hit by an oak tree trunk' with a slowed/delayed count by the ref allowing Douglas to survive the round in which led to him knocking out Tyson out in the 10th & as they say the rest is history.
Tyson went from a fighting machine who loved hurting his opponent early on in his career to a fighter who lost a lot his hunger (particularly when he returned after his incarceration) & a fighter who was only interested in a payday & being surrounded by yes-men who wouldn't dare criticize him neglecting his training ruined him as well.
Tyson was a mere husk of the fighter he was when he fought the likes of Holyfield & Lewis.
If Anthony Joshua had fought Tyson at his peek (in his early 20's) I reckon the fight would have played out the same as Tyson-Bruno first fight where Bruno & Joshua are identically built impressive muscled specimens,but ultimately large muscle bulk in all combat sports whilst can increase punch power it does slow a fighter down as well as leading to conditioning problems.Like Tyson was too quick for Bruno he would have equally been too fast for Joshua.
I think Larry Holmes (a great fighter in his day) dismissal of Tyson comes from the grudge he has always had as Tyson was the only fighter to stop & knock Holmes out.
I watched Anthony Joshua on Bear Gryll's survival episode & he genuinely seems like a well grounded,level headed & all round great guy who I hope goes to unify & dominate the Heavyweight division.