S66 new website launch

(04-01-2022 00:22 )ryuken Wrote:  

(03-01-2022 21:53 )Boomerangutangangbang Wrote:  

(03-01-2022 21:33 )Spike1876 Wrote:  One difference being, the "freeloaders" now can't see the chat or interact. They can only watch.

That is definite progress, it stop time-wasters, attention seekers, & those that just ask the same questions.

If this is successful for S66, I wouldn't be surprised if the babes on BS ask for similar restrictions on trolls.

As already mentioned, the babes moderate their own chat on Bs and trolls aren't a problem.

They shouldn't be a problem here either. If all this is just about trolls, they're using a sledgehammer to crack a nut.

** No I doubt this is all about trolls, more about bad business practice, resulting in loss of trust from the customer.

Makes no difference if there are freeloaders or not, a channel that is clearly struggling and we will see in the coming months if the girls move to different channels to get noticed and to make a decent living.

(03-01-2022 22:04 )get in the van Wrote:  

(03-01-2022 21:33 )Spike1876 Wrote:  One difference being, the "freeloaders" now can't see the chat or interact. They can only watch.

I thought it had been that way for a long time?

Yes me too, I thought it had been that way for almost a year.

I had a nasty experience many years ago with studio66 caused by their telephone lines, therefore I have only been a freeloader since,I can confirm only logged In callers could make comments on their site. This being the case I don't think this new site was created to stop trolls I think it is designed to stop freeloaders , recorders who post clips to other sites and maybe to stop the arseholes at ofcom throwing the book at them.
I also think it has been badly designed and improperly tested and whoever sanctioned its go live is obviously clueless.

Cherry Anderson is now on BS. She might be the first babe to switch channels since S66's new site launched.

(04-01-2022 12:20 )baywatcher Wrote:  I think it is designed to stop freeloaders , recorders who post clips to other sites and maybe to stop the arseholes at ofcom throwing the book at them.

The new design wouldn't achieve either of those things. Besides, they were issues which were already being addressed.

The purpose of the new design was reported earlier by dancesonthesand, who quoted gallery as follows:

"One-on-one Camming with sound and Video. No video delay, HD streams. Cheaper Calls. Girls can upload their own content, Offline Private messaging, Calls and Toys. The ability to Stream from Phones, out and about. Available anywhere around the world, Calls and cam plus many more to come."

(03-01-2022 21:44 )Neil8670 Wrote:  Get this tried to cancel my vip. But today they have taken it out 4 times out of my account not happ

Right do i use these credits up because i have £15 extra.?They already owe for credits missing.

(04-01-2022 13:46 )7 stars of the orient Wrote:  ...
they were issues which were already being addressed.
....

Can you tell me what you had in mind for how recordings were being addressed please?

(04-01-2022 12:07 )eskimo quinn Wrote:  

(03-01-2022 22:04 )get in the van Wrote:  

(03-01-2022 21:33 )Spike1876 Wrote:  One difference being, the "freeloaders" now can't see the chat or interact. They can only watch.

I thought it had been that way for a long time?

Yes me too, I thought it had been that way for almost a year.

It's actually easier to watch fta stuff on their site now than it was in recent times. The old place had some streams properly Age Verified and thus blocked to a user without recent top up. Since the new site doesn't work properly the age verification thing doesn't actually block viewing of such streams at the mo.