Elite TV / Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion

Hi

I think you should try and bring back Tixie from the Babecast/Babestation show a few years ago and also Keira Pharrell to compliment your current line - up of pornstars.

Set up a media company in Spain and register them with the Spanish regulator.
Sell Elite TV to this company.
Inform Ofcom that you no longer require a licence from them as you now come under the spanish regulator.
If Ofcom complain point them to the Television Without Frontiers Directive.
Go back to the fun days!!!

Or

You could at least lower the onscreen banner to the bottom of the screen and maybe inform the cameraman that its there so he doesn't spend most of the night hiding the girls behind it.

[/quote]
Not having a go at you specifically but your the second channel to come on here and ask for ideas recently, the other was Chatback and they were given a lot of ideas and some constructive criticism and chose not to act on them, the result being they have got rid of some of the girls and cut back on the hours they are broadcasting, mainly because they have consistently failed to do even the basics right, which is not something we can accuse your channel of. We understand your trying to find an identity for your channel to make it stand out from the rest and I'm sure we'll be able to help you out in the coming months.

For what it's worth my preference is for naturally sexy girls, one pair of panties, see-through or crotchless if possible, and small onscreen graphics, thats just for starters.
[/quote]

yes either smaller graphics or move them to the top of the screen or right at the very bottom. Where they are they just hide too much.

i actually hope you can be the new bang babes but better. for the last year they've had some of hottest babes around, but in the last 2 months seem to have lost the best ones. for me personally its 99% about hot ladies so dionne & alexa are great coups for shear beauty. juliette would have been the perfect hat-trick (is it too late???). as mentioned precious and fernanda ferrari would be top of my wanted list too, along with a return of vicky valentine. emma spellar or lisa marie bourke doing nights would be amazing also. good luck with perfecting it for us & thanks for asking our opinions.

My Suggestions For Girls To Poach:

1)Daryl Morgan
2)Alex Adams
3)Tiffany (babestation)
4)Reede
5)Amanda Rendall
6)Caty Cole
7)Kelly Bell
8)Dani O'Neal
9)Holly
10)Jennifer Keelings
11)Lolly Badcock

P.S: Save The Precious, Save The World

red dwarf Wrote:My Suggestions For Girls To Poach:

1)Daryl Morgan
2)Alex Adams
3)Tiffany (babestation)
4)Reede
5)Amanda Rendall
6)Caty Cole
7)Kelly Bell
8)Dani O'Neal
9)Holly
10)Jennifer Keelings
11)Lolly Badcock

How about some natural, not plastic titted girls. Bad boob jobs look ridiculous, not sexy. A bigger set, more lighting, better underwear i.e. less covering and try to bend the rules. If you provide the same product as everyone else you will fail miserably.

P.S: Save The Precious, Save The World

rover Wrote:

perana68 Wrote:Turn the bloody lights on! It looks good but can hardly make it out

l have to agree Normal Norm you need more lighting.

I already said about the lights http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.ph...675&page=6 & Normal Norm - Luvs it said (passed to the Production)

There's 1 other Major flaw and that is the cam is to high! We wanna see all of the girls not from the belly up. I actually got fed up watching the channel cause of the high cam so i changed the channel, sorry to be rude but that's a turn of.

Does any 1 ells find the cam way to high? It's the same as 963 high cams would make you change the channel.

Tintin Wrote:

rover Wrote:

perana68 Wrote:Turn the bloody lights on! It looks good but can hardly make it out

l have to agree Normal Norm you need more lighting.

I already said about the lights http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.ph...675&page=6 & Normal Norm - Luvs it said (passed to the Production)

There's 1 other Major flaw and that is the cam is to high! We wanna see all of the girls not from the belly up. I actually got fed up watching the channel cause of the high cam so i changed the channel, sorry to be rude but that's a turn of.

Does any 1 ells find the cam way to high? It's the same as 963 high cams would make you change the channel.

Tin Tin

Got to agree I thought the camera man was all over the place, but then again it's a producer who will be calling the shots or should be! Way too much movement, and alot of high shots, and I don't know if you noticed that the camera seemed to move to Alexa away from Natalie an awful lot which was doing my head in.

Hopefully Norm will take the comments on board and pass on, like you I found myself flicking to other channels.

Liking the choice of girls and to me, that's the main thing. Can't be too critical so early on as they've obviously got things to try out. Two things i'll agree on though, is the camera work and the lighting, they need to be played with to get a better all round viewing pleasure

All in all, i'm liking what i've seen so far. Hope to see it continue along the path towards greatness and doesn't fail to impress like some others.

Keep us informed.

Wicked Many Thanks,

Will pass this over to the night time production crew!!

Seems like you guys picked up some good stuff to work on last night
many Thanks!!

Keep it coming! we will try and make changes as best and as quick as we can!!

Norm xx

Tintin Wrote:I already said about the lights http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.ph...675&page=6 & Normal Norm - Luvs it said (passed to the Production)

There's 1 other Major flaw and that is the cam is to high! We wanna see all of the girls not from the belly up. I actually got fed up watching the channel cause of the high cam so i changed the channel, sorry to be rude but that's a turn of.

Does any 1 ells find the cam way to high? It's the same as 963 high cams would make you change the channel.