StanTheMan
Banned
Posts: 3,790
Joined: May 2009
|
Ladyboys - a serious debate
I'd be interested to know what people's views are on this - without all the silly innuendoes and childish notion that all Thai women are actually ladyboys. I know this channel gets very few viewers - especialy from those that contribute to this forum on a regular basis - but that still doesn't stop those people giving their opinion.
My own view is that I have serious problems with their inclusion. Asian Babes (as the name suggests) is a 'Babe Channel' - a channel for babes. A channel for hetrosexual males to get their rocks off to. Now some will argue that enjoying these ladyboys doesn't necessarily make you queer, but the counter-argument to that would be that wanting to watch these boys thrusting their packets into the camera and miming felatio, isn't exactly the desires of your avergae hetrosexual either.
Furthermore, their obvious popularity leaves me completely baffled. Why would a person surfing through the babe channels stop at 949 and decide they'd like a bit of ladyboy action? Who is it that's phoning them, and why are they doing so?
I'm not homophobic - the stock answer for every homophobe that's ever lived, I know - but in this case it's true. I just don't think they have any place on a babe channel. If any discriminatory behaviour is happening here, it's against the straight man, as he is the one who now finds he can no longer enjoy a channel he used to.
(This post was last modified: 23-02-2010 02:31 by StanTheMan.)
|
|
23-02-2010 02:28 |
|
Mister Gummidge
Professional Strawman
Posts: 2,226
Joined: Sep 2008
Reputation: 131
|
RE: Ladyboys - a serious debate
"If you're receiving, you're not gay."
"It's not gay when you're in prison."
"It's not gay sex, it's an initiation rite"
All justifications used by "straight" men over the ages to justify bi-sexual urges and behaviours. "Straight" isn't a sexual predilection, it's a political label people apply to themselves. Our current society is one which still discriminates against same sex preferences. The very need to for people to label themselves as "Straight", "Bi", "Gay" or whatever, is proof of this. In a truly equal society such labelling would be unnecessary, as no-one would care enough to bother with the label. There are a lot of men who have these urges but label themselves as "straight". Should the option to express them only be available through "gay" targeted channels those men would never even switch on those channels to see. Having that option on a "straight" channel, allows men whose tastes run more colourful than vanilla to have an outlet, without having to apply a label to themselves that they don't want.
It's a very smart move by whoever runs Asian Babes to do this. They've found a niche and are playing it to the hilt. I say good luck to them. It doesn't put me off watching a porno when there's a man on screen at the same time as a woman, so it doesn't put me off watching a channel if there's a transvestite/transexual on at the same time as a woman.
"You say sarcasm is the lowest form of wit. I say that I tailor my jokes to the audience..."
|
|
23-02-2010 02:45 |
|
StanTheMan
Banned
Posts: 3,790
Joined: May 2009
|
RE: Ladyboys - a serious debate
(23-02-2010 02:59 )Yoko? Ono! Wrote: How often are they / how many are there on the channel?
Everynight, at least one, many times two.
|
|
23-02-2010 06:57 |
|
Josh187
The Fallenangel returns
Posts: 1,089
Joined: Oct 2009
|
RE: Ladyboys - a serious debate
I could not hardly care to be honest - i don't watch the channel, i never have really, and i have no plan to, it's most certainly the worst babe channel out there - so why care so much about?
I assume this channel is the most least viewed/watched and it probably only has a small minority of followers.
Asian Babes has no appeal to me as im not into Asian women and it kind of ruins it all when you find out there men
Maybe they couldn't find many genuine decent Asian babes to put on this channel so they turn to men? who knows?
Could be the reason that these 'ladyboys' do have appeal to some people - some are into that sort of thing and maybe the channel is using that as a ploy or a gimmick so to say, to attempt to get more callers/viewers of that nature.
Don't want to go to into the subject so i'll leave it at that, couldn't care less what they decide to do with this waste of a channel but all i know is i won't be watching..
Very intrigued why you are so interested in this channel stan?
(This post was last modified: 23-02-2010 13:32 by Josh187.)
|
|
23-02-2010 13:31 |
|