Ladyboys - a serious debate

Its not for me and its the one channel i barely spend 5 seconds on.However if thats what people are in to then fair play, we don't have to watch the channel and if you are in to Asian babes then you know there is a better than even chance this will happen.

i wouldn't mind if ladyboys had their own channel just as long as it's advertised as a ladyboy channel so those us who aren't interested in that sort of thing can skip past that channel and watch one of the babe channels. i think the only reason why it's not advertised as a ladyboy channel is because the people in charge know that a LOT less people would watch it if they knew it was a ladyboy channel so they just basically advertise it as one of the babe channels and hope that none of us can tell the difference.

Some of y'all need to chill out and relax....experiment a little

Is all graaaavy!

I like it - but then personally I'm into bi porn etc as well so don't see a huge difference in it.....and it is perhaps less of an issue from a female perspective. To me, a woman with a cock is the perfect performer*

But it's all just sex


*and I don't mean just a cock

Like many of you i am not turned on by Trannies / Ladyboys but everyone should have the opportunity to watch what they want. Once you know the format of Asian Babes it is quite easy just to flip past the channel if you channel hop like i do because i have many favourite babes on various channels.

As a matter of interest i did stop the one night as i was intrigued and i think you can spot the Ladyboys by their attire. They tend to wear larger panties than the girls or seem to hide their meat & two veg by keeping their legs closed until turning to show their ass. Again with some of them their bodies appear more manly but PLEASE NOTE i am not an expert in this field and simpley prefer the ladies.

I like how you say I'm not homophobe but call homosexuals 'queer'

That would be like saying I'm not racist about these n*&^%$£rs!

(23-02-2010 09:10 )rover Wrote:  Well l have to say they don't do anything for me personally and l do wonder if some of the people ringing up actually realise they are talking to a transvestite/transsexual person how many guys have been to Thailand picked up a beautiful girl only to find there carrying meat and two veg. There should be some indication on screen to make callers aware that they may be talking to a transvestite/transsexual person.
There is obviously a market for it because the girls/guys always seem to be busy on the phone so good luck to them it's just not my cup of tea.

and alysha your tits are fine.

I've been to Thailand more times than i can count over the years and i can assure you that "picking up a beautiful Thai girl only to find that they are carrying meat and two veg" is pretty much an Urban Myth.....People generally love to think that it happens a lot, but in truth if happens rarely, hardly at all in fact. Even a semi-trained eye can generally spot them a mile off and the fact is that the Ladyboys themselves really are not interested in the kind of "surprise action" that you describe. They are very much looking for punters that actually WANT the service that they provide, in exactly the same way as the girls. They are far more likely to actually "put off" a punter that was about to make a serious mistake, rather than let the situation get back to the hotel room and a potential problem.

(The other "Urban Myth" that i'll put to rest here is that old chestnut about "i found out she was a bloke, so i kicked the shit out of him".......Most Thai Ladyboys can FIGHT, the vast majority of them better than most "genuine" blokes, trust me on that one)

My point being, is that most likely the same differential exists for the Ladyboy showing his/her wares on tv......They're not trying to trick or fool anybody, particularly not if they're genuine Thai. They are looking for phone callers that actually like Ladyboys and there must be quite a few (not me personally, i hasten to add ) the ones that i've seen seem pretty busy to me.

But isn't it the very essence of the 900 channels that they should be allowed to exist if they're making the channel owners money? Stan, it's a bit of a contradiction in terms if you want to complain about Ofcom continually poking their noses in, (so much so that you've started a blog to that effect) yet on the other hand you want to ban this type of titillation, which in effect is all it is. It may not be your bag, (it's not mine either) but i would give you the same advice that you would very readily hand out to a "Mary Whitehouse" type that by "pure chance" stumbled across a "disgusting 900 channel babe with her tits out and one hand down her g-string" and was about to pick up the phone and dial Ofcom.......

Point your remote at the tv and change the channel, bud.

(23-02-2010 19:10 )colino Wrote:  

(23-02-2010 09:10 )rover Wrote:  Well l have to say they don't do anything for me personally and l do wonder if some of the people ringing up actually realise they are talking to a transvestite/transsexual person how many guys have been to Thailand picked up a beautiful girl only to find there carrying meat and two veg. There should be some indication on screen to make callers aware that they may be talking to a transvestite/transsexual person.
There is obviously a market for it because the girls/guys always seem to be busy on the phone so good luck to them it's just not my cup of tea.

and alysha your tits are fine.

I've been to Thailand more times than i can count over the years and i can assure you that "picking up a beautiful Thai girl only to find that they are carrying meat and two veg" is pretty much an Urban Myth.....People generally love to think that it happens a lot, but in truth if happens rarely, hardly at all in fact. Even a semi-trained eye can generally spot them a mile off and the fact is that the Ladyboys themselves really are not interested in the kind of "surprise action" that you describe. They are very much looking for punters that actually WANT the service that they provide, in exactly the same way as the girls. They are far more likely to actually "put off" a punter that was about to make a serious mistake, rather than let the situation get back to the hotel room and a potential problem.

Thanks for clarifying that urban myth colino

Im surprised there isnt a shemale channel,a lesbian channel,a gay channel,a bi channel,an old lady channel and so on. If its to fall in line with the 'demands' of internet porn, then anything and everything should go. Perhaps i agree that the two shouldnt be intermingled to confuse the caller,(tho i dont care),but if there were a channel featuring high quality pornstar type shemales, there would be threads full of caps and vids just like the others.

(23-02-2010 02:28 )StanTheMan Wrote:  I'd be interested to know what people's views are on this - without all the silly innuendoes and childish notion that all Thai women are actually ladyboys. I know this channel gets very few viewers - especialy from those that contribute to this forum on a regular basis - but that still doesn't stop those people giving their opinion.

My own view is that I have serious problems with their inclusion. Asian Babes (as the name suggests) is a 'Babe Channel' - a channel for babes. A channel for hetrosexual males to get their rocks off to. Now some will argue that enjoying these ladyboys doesn't necessarily make you queer, but the counter-argument to that would be that wanting to watch these boys thrusting their packets into the camera and miming felatio, isn't exactly the desires of your avergae hetrosexual either.

Furthermore, their obvious popularity leaves me completely baffled. Why would a person surfing through the babe channels stop at 949 and decide they'd like a bit of ladyboy action? Who is it that's phoning them, and why are they doing so?

I'm not homophobic - the stock answer for every homophobe that's ever lived, I know - but in this case it's true. I just don't think they have any place on a babe channel. If any discriminatory behaviour is happening here, it's against the straight man, as he is the one who now finds he can no longer enjoy a channel he used to.

Stan i'll take your word for it that you're not homophobic but why on another thread did you think it appropriate to call them "freaks" ?

(23-02-2010 02:28 )StanTheMan Wrote:  I'd be interested to know what people's views are on this - without all the silly innuendoes and childish notion that all Thai women are actually ladyboys. I know this channel gets very few viewers - especialy from those that contribute to this forum on a regular basis - but that still doesn't stop those people giving their opinion.

My own view is that I have serious problems with their inclusion. Asian Babes (as the name suggests) is a 'Babe Channel' - a channel for babes. A channel for hetrosexual males to get their rocks off to. Now some will argue that enjoying these ladyboys doesn't necessarily make you queer, but the counter-argument to that would be that wanting to watch these boys thrusting their packets into the camera and miming felatio, isn't exactly the desires of your avergae hetrosexual either.

Furthermore, their obvious popularity leaves me completely baffled. Why would a person surfing through the babe channels stop at 949 and decide they'd like a bit of ladyboy action? Who is it that's phoning them, and why are they doing so?

I didn't know that some of these Asian Babes were actually Asian dudes

Now personally i hold no prejudice towards people with differing sexual tendancies but I think really they should be making it more clear on this channel that its possible you could be talking to a guy.

As has already been stated I think there is a place for a Gay,Lesbian, s&m etc etc channels, but it needs to be clearly identified as such. As for the "ladyboys" popularity Stan obviously its each to their own. Many guys are gonna be into that kind of thing, I dont really know what surprises you about that. Surely just trawling for a few hours through the forum you can plainly see that some folks are into some weird shit.....no punn intended