Tit tape and "clothing"

(03-10-2010 14:26 )loulo12 Wrote:  I'm watching, I'm watching. What a fine woman you are.

WOAH, I just did a google, is that you with the goddess that is Emily Cartwright? - my all time fav babe?

Yes baby and also with the notorious Michelle Monaghan....

Danni was on this afternoon with tape on her areolas/nipples and that was it some of the time. Its only amtter of time before its nips and nothing. Quite bizarre how they are "getting away" with this.

(05-10-2010 21:02 )mikeboob Wrote:  Danni was on this afternoon with tape on her areolas/nipples and that was it some of the time. Its only amtter of time before its nips and nothing. Quite bizarre how they are "getting away" with this.

are you kidding me mate,no offence but tit tape and nipple pads are so un natural,i mean,,u wouldn`t walk down the street an see a bird wearing fucking nipple pads and or tit tape would ya ? well i wouldnt round here anyway but my point is
she and the other girls looked alot sexier all natural no matter what the outfit was and that is only the point ive been trying to say for ages i just saw kelly bell then looking extremely nice but still
i`m unsure whether she has tape or pads on
but over to her thread im goin for massive compliments coz she lookes like a girlie cleopatra quality

Think I have to agree with pewack1976. I cant stand tit tape or them nipple sticker things. Much prefere to see them without even if it does mean slightly more clothes. At least then you know no matter what there is half a chance of a nip slip. Anyway that tit tape pulls their tits all out of shape and to be honest looks damn uncomfortable for those wearing it.

pewack1976 I didn't say I approved - its a distraction. I'm just observing that its getting more blatent and I'm curious as to why/how.

(06-10-2010 22:16 )mikeboob Wrote:  pewack1976 I didn't say I approved - its a distraction. I'm just observing that its getting more blatent and I'm curious as to why/how.

I have asked the question before... how is the daytime more sexy and almost as revealing as the nightime???/

As i said towards the beginning of this thread i believe the channels are operating within guidance issued by Ofcom for the presenters clothing. Ofcom always refer to previous decisions in bulletins and whilst there have been daytime breaches these have been for nip slips and suggestive movements/fondling, there has never been a mention about the minimal aspect of the clothing.

Post 6

So now the channels are operating within guidance issued by Ofcom that no nipples are to be exposed. Now it is not a question of how much breast is exposed BUT how it is exposed. Ofcom do not need to state what percentage of breast exposure is suitable only that they believe that the material has no editorial context other than sexual stimulation and such material should not be broadcast at a time when children are able to view it = breach.

I say enjoy it whilst you can because it will not last. If you read other threads associated with Ofcom you will see that there are current investigations against the channels. So far 11 additional complaints in August against Bang Babes/Early Bird.

It is so easy for Ofcom to find these daytime channels in breach of 1.3 “Children must be protected by appropriate scheduling from material that is unsuitable for them.”

Children are defined as under 15 years.

When the daytime shows are pushing out content that is probably 12a or 15 rated then they will always be found in breach. How boring would a channel be if the content was at U rating. Then the channel would be in breach of not meeting the likely expectations of the audience lol.

Anyway Elite are the first channels to be found in breach with the presenter wearing of a mesh top with nipple covers and a c-thru lace thong. Sounds like Alice. Damn why am i always at the office during the day.

The decision.

Elite Days
Elite TV 2, 6 August 2010, 12:24
Introduction

Elite Days is a televised daytime interactive chat programme broadcast without mandatory restricted access on Elite TV2. Viewers are invited to contact onscreen female presenters via premium rate telephony services (“PRS”). The presenters generally dress and behave in a flirtatious manner. The licence for the service Elite TV2 is held by Over 18 TV Ltd (“Over 18 TV” or the “Licensee”).The service is available freely without mandatory restricted access on Sky channel number 914. This channel is situated in the 'adult' section of the Sky electronic programme guide ("EPG").

As a result of Ofcom’s concerns about compliance in this sector, Ofcom conducts occasional monitoring of daytime chat channels.

In this case, Ofcom noted that the female presenter was wearing a very skimpy mesh and string vest showing her naked breasts beneath with only plasters over her nipples, and a see through lace thong. During the broadcast the presenter adopted various sexual positions for periods of time, including on her front with her bottom in the air, and on her side with her legs apart. While in these positions she repeatedly stroked and touched her body, buttocks and breasts, and wiggled and thrust her hips in the air in a sexually provocative way. She also pulled her mesh vest over her buttocks while pushing her hips in the air.

Ofcom requested comments from Over 18 TV under Rule 1.3 (“Children must be protected by appropriate scheduling from material that is unsuitable for them.”)

Response

Over 18 TV acknowledged that the presenter’s clothing might raise potential issues under the Code but stated its belief that the clothing was within the margins of acceptability of the Code. The Licensee did, however, offer its apologies and assurance that it was taking steps to ensure this incident was not repeated. Over 18 TV agreed that nipple covers were not suitable attire for a female presenter for daytime broadcasts and “may cross the line from sexy in to sexual attire”.

Over 18 TV explained that on this particular day a junior producer had been left in charge of the output whilst the company had an away day. The producer and the presenter were aware of what was suitable attire but its internal compliance document made no specific reference to nipple covers, only that “breasts must be covered at all times ensuring no nipple or areola are visible”. Over 18 TV added that, having seen presenters on other channels using nipple covers, the producer and presenter concluded that there was no compliance issue. Over 18 TV stated that this decision was incorrect and have now advised their presenters and producers to err on the side of caution.

Over 18 TV said it had now changed its internal compliance manual to state that “breasts must be covered with a bra at all times ensuring no nipple or areola are visible. Nipple covers, small straps or anything other than a bra which covers the breast as well as nipples are strictly prohibited between the hours of 5.30am and 9pm”.

With regard to the presenter’s performance, Over 18 TV said that she was not acting in a sexual way. She was a well known glamour model and the positions she adopted were similar to those seen in photo shoots for magazines. The Licensee said that overall her performance was sexy rather than mimicking any sexual act, and that the presenter behaved at all times in a relaxed rather than sexually provocative manner.

Over 18 TV added that it was unlikely that children would come across the material unawares given the position of the channel on the Sky EPG and that parental controls were available to block material. Over 18 TV also said that it was unlikely that children would find the material sexual in any way, that there was no full nudity, and no images could be considered harmful. It said that near nudity and provocative material are available on mainstream and other channels which are widely accessible and which are not so easy to block using parental controls.

Decision

Rule 1.3 makes clear that children should be protected by appropriate scheduling from material which is unsuitable for them. Appropriate scheduling is judged according to factors such as: the nature of the content; the likely number of children in the audience, taking into account such factors as school time; the start and finish time of the programme; the nature of the channel; and, the likely expectations of the audience for a particular channel or station at a particular time and a particular day. It should be noted that the watershed starts at 21:00 and material unsuitable for children should not, in general, be shown before 21:00 or after 05:30.

Ofcom has made clear in numerous previous published findings what sort of material is unsuitable to be included in daytime interactive chat programmes without mandatory restricted access (-1-). In the context of daytime interactive chat programmes where the presenters generally dress and behave in a flirtatious matter for extended periods in order to solicit PRS calls, Ofcom underlined that the presenters should not, for example, appear to mimic or simulate sexual acts or behave in an overtly sexual manner and clothing should be appropriate for the time of broadcast. These decisions were also summarised in a guidance letter sent by Ofcom to daytime and adult sex chat broadcasters in August 2009.

This broadcast was transmitted at lunchtime and featured a female presenter wearing a very skimpy outfit of a sexual nature. The presenter was shown acting in a sexualised way – for example by adopting various sexual positions for periods of time, such as: lying on her front with her legs open and bottom raised in the air; and lying on her side with her legs open (albeit away from camera). While in these positions the presenter repeatedly wiggled or gyrated her buttocks in a sexually provocative way as though mimicking sexual activity or excitement. She also stroked parts of her body, including her breasts, thighs and buttocks.

We note the Licensee’s assertions that: children are unlikely to find the material sexual as there was no full nudity and similar material is available on mainstream and other channels; that the presenter was a well known glamour model and her pictures can be seen in magazines; and that the attire worn by the presenter was sexy rather than sexual. However, in this instance the presenter’s breasts were naked under her mesh vest except for plasters covering her nipples and her actions added to the sexual nature of the content. Ofcom noted the Licensee’s point that the producer said he had seen female presenters wearing similar clothing on other daytime chat services. Licensees should never assume that because other broadcasters include certain actions in their output that this is compliant with the requirements of the Code.– especially when Ofcom has provided clear guidance on that area of broadcasting (see footnote 1). In Ofcom’s opinion, this material was clearly unsuitable for children.

Ofcom then considered whether this material was appropriately scheduled. We concluded that the content included in the broadcast as described above, had limited editorial justification since its primary purpose was to elicit PRS calls. It was broadcast during the day and in school holidays when children may have been watching television, some unaccompanied by an adult. While Ofcom noted that the material was broadcast on a channel in the adult section of the EPG, there was the clear potential for children, should they be flicking through the EPG, to come across the channel unawares. We accept that adult channels on the Sky EPG can be blocked by means of a PIN parental protection system. However this does not absolve broadcasters from their responsibility to comply material so as to protect children from material that is unsuitable for them.

Ofcom concluded that the content of this broadcast was clearly unsuitable for children and not appropriately scheduled. Therefore the content breached Rule 1.3 of the Code.

Breach of Rule 1.3

As it has been said many times in various threads the broadcaster will never win as Ofcoms interpretation of the code and their guidance is so poor that the channels do not know where the boundaries are so any attempt at pushing the limits will always be found in breach.

Elite are now the first channel to state that between 05.30 and 21.00 hours all presenters will now wear bras and no other style of covering on the breasts.

Yet another victory for Ofcom. Can't wait for the new appeal hearing by Jon Gaunt or the appeal by Bang Media, someone needs to take these buffoons to task and get an independant appeals procedure in place.

Other decisions against the babe channels this fortnight.

http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/enforce...ns/obb168/

Why not also show adult material during the day I mean so long as its pin protected why should it be a problem, some of us do have to work the nightshift.

(26-10-2010 21:30 )Gold Plated Pension Wrote:  Yet another victory for Ofcom. Can't wait for the new appeal hearing by Jon Gaunt or the appeal by Bang Media, someone needs to take these buffoons to task and get an independant appeals procedure in place.

Yes; they do need to be taken to task!!.......Unfortunately it will not be by those whose livelihoods are sustainable under the status quo.

I'd open this thread to discussing the tits stickers fashion. A new industrial mode nowadays. Personnaly I don't like this kind of stuffs. I prefer the babes when they put sexy light outfits allowing some ''accidental'' slips, rather than showing the whole boobs with an annoying sticky material on it. It's not exciting for me. And you what did you think?