StanTheMan
Banned
Posts: 3,790
Joined: May 2009
|
RE: CGTV "After Hours" Web Show Info & Chat
(12-01-2011 00:02 )aceman65 Wrote: (11-01-2011 21:15 )StanTheMan Wrote: I think the argument with most, certainly with me, is that there's so much webcam live chat on the web that it doesn't really hold any appeal - even when it's your favourite babeshow girls taking part.
I really don't get that. If it holds no appeal to you personally, then why did you watch. If something has no appeal to me, I certainly don't watch it.
I think you've misunderstood, aceman. I don't watch the webshows, that was my whole point.
|
|
12-01-2011 21:52 |
|
skateguy
Posting Machine
Posts: 8,776
Joined: Jul 2008
Reputation: 477
|
RE: CGTV "After Hours" Web Show Info & Chat
(13-01-2011 14:17 )aceman65 Wrote: I guess I didn't understand you fully. But if you don't watch any webstreams, then how can you say there unappealing. Or is it the concept of webstreams you find unappealing in general?
I think I understand what Stan means - he's a voyeur (I don't think he'll mind me saying this). His Raison d'être for watching the channels (on TV) is to see something that he shouldn't (the goal of a voyeur). Watching on a webstream where the only restrictions are the self imposed ones of the model or the site, means that although he might see more explicit content, he would rarely, if ever, be likely to see something he shouldn't. Therefore by extension, a webstream however explicit, won't meet his needs.
And going even further off-topic (don't tell the mods), but if I'm right with the above, I suspect that this presents a paradoxical situation - its because of the sanctions imposed by Ofcom that Stan gets to see what he wants (slips etc that he shouldn't), yet he's also one of the more vocal anti-ofcom members. If Ofcom were to cease to be, or to allow the TV-based babe shows to show explicit content without restriction, would that not then 'spoil' them as viewable content and put them on a par with the webstreams in terms of interest...?
.
|
|
.
|
|
13-01-2011 15:50 |
|
dazaman
Posting Machine
Posts: 1,439
Joined: Jan 2010
Reputation: 108
|
|
13-01-2011 22:13 |
|
LovinAss
Apprentice Poster
Posts: 4
Joined: Jan 2011
Reputation: 0
|
RE: CGTV "After Hours" Web Show Info & Chat
They wearin less on elite tv? i thought the webstream was going to be a bit more 'raunchier'?
|
|
13-01-2011 22:29 |
|
StanTheMan
Banned
Posts: 3,790
Joined: May 2009
|
RE: CGTV "After Hours" Web Show Info & Chat
(13-01-2011 15:50 )skateguy Wrote: (13-01-2011 14:17 )aceman65 Wrote: I guess I didn't understand you fully. But if you don't watch any webstreams, then how can you say there unappealing. Or is it the concept of webstreams you find unappealing in general?
I think I understand what Stan means - he's a voyeur (I don't think he'll mind me saying this). His Raison d'être for watching the channels (on TV) is to see something that he shouldn't (the goal of a voyeur). Watching on a webstream where the only restrictions are the self imposed ones of the model or the site, means that although he might see more explicit content, he would rarely, if ever, be likely to see something he shouldn't. Therefore by extension, a webstream however explicit, won't meet his needs.
That's so spookily accurate that you've actually frightened me, skateguy.
|
|
13-01-2011 22:59 |
|