Can anybody tell me?

This is something that has really pissed me off for years now, and I just can`t understand.
Tonight I am watching bsx [not worth the fiver for the so called live show],but what I am curious to know is,why can we be allowed to watch a girl sucking an `exact` replica of an erect penis [along with an exact replica of balls],why is this?

You would never ever see an exact replica of a womans vagina being licked out by a man.

Why is it ok to see a womans mouth wrapped around an exact replica of a mans penis,but at the same time not allowed to see the replica in her vagina?

Is someone out there going to tell me that any child ,watching, would know that this replica was made out of rubber/silicon ,I think not!

This is what pisses me off about the nanny brigade,a 4 digit number is what protects us from anyone accessing our bank accounts/credit card accounts,these people that have made this so are not morons and know that if 4 digits are enough that is that [can you imagine how much it would cost the banks if it wasn`t?]
Now for some reason,afew years ago OFCOM dicided that we would not be allowed to watch R18 content on our tv`s because a 4 Digit pin was not sufficient to stop a CHILD from accidentaly watching the R18 content.

For fucks sake Lifelike replica of erect penis,NO replica of a womans vagina,must not show opened vagina detail,must not show penis contact with vagina,No penetration,no sexual body fluids

Our tv censorship laws [sorry, rules,] are so outdated that anyone coming from the Euro member states for a visit to Britain,who would want to watch a bit of skin on a night time,would probably have a laughing fit at what is portraid as [filth,hardcore fucking,etc.etc.] you all know what I mean.

So why is this allowed? tell me please because I am at a complete loss

Pure and simple Ofcom don't like porn and are very fucked up in religious and moralistic views of society and will use any excuse to have it banned. It doesn't matter a fuck whether or not its a 4, 6 or even 8 digit pin number the fuckwits at Ofcom will allways come up with reasons similar to that of RCTV to stop it being allowed in this country.

Ofcom rules state that encrypted channels must verify that the viewer is an adult. So PIN = Adult. Go figure.

(13-02-2011 02:36 )eccles Wrote:  Ofcom rules state that encrypted channels must verify that the viewer is an adult. So PIN = Adult. Go figure.

Are you just writing for writings sake Eccles,what the fuck are you taking about?
Encryption = 4 digits
Bank/credit card = 4 digits
If 4 digits is not safe then bank/credit cards are not safe,comprehendy!!

ofcon doesn't like vaginas, and finds them to be dangerous, offensive and scary. Why else would they allow penises to be shown on normal TV, yet no vaginas. All they are doing is demonizing a normal body part because of how it looks, and it's quite insulting to women I would think. Now, you will see some brief uncensored vaginal images here and there on normal TV, but usually, penises seem to be more welcome.

Very strange indeed.

I am not disagreeing with you, NailPouch, about whether PINS are safe or not. Of course they are.

What I was doing was saying what the Ofcom rules say and trying, in my feeble way, to show that there is a gap between the rules and what Ofcom allow on a major scale.

Using a credit card or debit card, verified by a PIN, is not a substitute for verifying that the subscriber is an adult. All it means is that they have been issued with a credit or debit card in their own name. Banks issue debit cards to 16 year olds. Banks will also issue a credit card to a 16 year old provided an adult acts as a guarantor. So checking that the subscriber has a credit/debit card proves nothing. Technically the Sky Movies channels break Ofcom rules when they use this route to confirm access to cert 18 films with sexual content.

(13-02-2011 03:12 )eccles Wrote:  I am not disagreeing with you, NailPouch, about whether PINS are safe or not. Of course they are.

What I was doing was saying what the Ofcom rules say and trying, in my feeble way, to show that there is a gap between the rules and what Ofcom allow on a major scale.

Using a credit card or debit card, verified by a PIN, is not a substitute for verifying that the subscriber is an adult. All it means is that they have been issued with a credit or debit card in their own name. Banks issue debit cards to 16 year olds. Banks will also issue a credit card to a 16 year old provided an adult acts as a guarantor. So checking that the subscriber has a credit/debit card proves nothing. Technically the Sky Movies channels break Ofcom rules when they use this route to confirm access to cert 18 films with sexual content.

I think we are on different lines here,
The reason why we are not watching R18 classed material on british tv at the moment ,is because OFCOM took it on themselves to say `the current encryption with 4 digits is insufficiant to stop any person under the age of 18 watching encrypted channels`.
THIS IS WHAT I AM ON ABOUT.
Not that 16 yr olds can get a credit/bank card,that is irrevelent.
I am by the way watching at this moment some porn over on 19 degrees east,it is Dorcel tv and it is hard core,not something I usualy watch but I just flicked it on.
There in the bottom right of the screen is a logo...16..which just goes to show how our different cultures have evolved...

(13-02-2011 01:04 )nailpouchofmine Wrote:  This is something that has really pissed me off for years now, and I just can`t understand.
Tonight I am watching bsx [not worth the fiver for the so called live show],but what I am curious to know is,why can we be allowed to watch a girl sucking an `exact` replica of an erect penis [along with an exact replica of balls],why is this?

You would never ever see an exact replica of a womans vagina being licked out by a man.

Why is it ok to see a womans mouth wrapped around an exact replica of a mans penis,but at the same time not allowed to see the replica in her vagina?

Is someone out there going to tell me that any child ,watching, would know that this replica was made out of rubber/silicon ,I think not!

This is what pisses me off about the nanny brigade,a 4 digit number is what protects us from anyone accessing our bank accounts/credit card accounts,these people that have made this so are not morons and know that if 4 digits are enough that is that [can you imagine how much it would cost the banks if it wasn`t?]
Now for some reason,afew years ago OFCOM dicided that we would not be allowed to watch R18 content on our tv`s because a 4 Digit pin was not sufficient to stop a CHILD from accidentaly watching the R18 content.

For fucks sake Lifelike replica of erect penis,NO replica of a womans vagina,must not show opened vagina detail,must not show penis contact with vagina,No penetration,no sexual body fluids

Our tv censorship laws [sorry, rules,] are so outdated that anyone coming from the Euro member states for a visit to Britain,who would want to watch a bit of skin on a night time,would probably have a laughing fit at what is portraid as [filth,hardcore fucking,etc.etc.] you all know what I mean.

So why is this allowed? tell me please because I am at a complete loss

It's absolutely crazy, isn't it.

The other one of Ofcon's "beauts" is fellatio on a real penis. It can be shown if the man is still wearing his underpants or it can be shown in sillhouette. Ofcon allow that. I'd like to see the evidence-based study which specifically points out that children will not be harmed when viewing this activity but will be harmed if they see full-on fellatio.

Even better is urination. BBFC say that urination in sex works is always R18. Urination IS shown on encrypted channels!!
What we have on the encrypted channels is urination only if children don't see the urine exiting from the vagina.

They can see the woman urinating from the side or full-on if she is wearing her panties. Why is this ok for children to see? Where are the studies done by professionals to back this up?

I suppose the danger is, though, that if children see someone urinating on TV, that they might want to imitate that behaviour and urinate themselves.

Hang on.........................................


What a total lot of hogwash we have from Ofcon. Please piss off !!!

Ofcom have a point, studies show that huge numbers of kids urinate.

(13-02-2011 01:04 )nailpouchofmine Wrote:  This is something that has really pissed me off for years now, and I just can`t understand.
Tonight I am watching bsx [not worth the fiver for the so called live show],but what I am curious to know is,why can we be allowed to watch a girl sucking an `exact` replica of an erect penis [along with an exact replica of balls],why is this?

You would never ever see an exact replica of a womans vagina being licked out by a man.

Are you sure that licking out replica vaginas is banned? Is there really a big paying audience for ugly blokes licking falsies? If I see a babe fellating a dildo its the babes cute face that turns me on, not the prothesis. If it is banned thats wrong.

What is also wrong is the industry wide "voluntary" ban on boy-girl. Its completely against sex equality and sexual orinietation laws. You cant have even tame boy-girl on free channels (tasty 2-4-1 last night wih nipple sucking and frottage, and no Im not telling when or which channel)) but even breast hugging is not allowed. And pre-recorded material can show anything short of actual genital contact and stiffies, but any channel that showed live show side on shots of BG fellatio or cunnilungus would be fast tracked to Carey Street.