Call it a day

(15-01-2012 14:33 )RESPONSIBLE ADULT Wrote:  I know that my view is the right one

It is certainly the right one for you.

(14-01-2012 19:17 )Addison Wrote:  You guys pushing for more explicit material are going to have to accept that a lot of other guys would, given the choice, prefer to see softcore shows where the babes retain a bit of class and dignity, and aren't reduced to hardcore stereotype of the thrusting, moaning automaton. It's not a cop-out stance; it's not settling for what they can get; it's not 'fanboys' in thrall to their favourite babes, ringing out of obsequious loyalty; it comes down to taste and preference. This is what they would choose to watch if NO watchdog committees were in operation.

A good point, but having encryption wouldn't mean they had to do overly hardcore shows, but would mean that a normal body part called a vagina would be allowed to be shown for once.

The issue that might arrise, would be that some would have the expectation that the women would do hardcore G/G or whatever, and they might be disappointed if only full frontal is shown, after paying the viewing fee. The content level would need to be addressed.

If I had my way, it would be for the channels to show what they like unencrypted, that way the women can have the allowance to do as they please, with no promises made. They could do a tease for certain callers, and could also promise to show all if they reach a certain call number, or when they have a proven caller that they like. Nobody would be able to complain anymore, because the women don't have to show more, they just CAN if they want.

(15-01-2012 14:33 )RESPONSIBLE ADULT Wrote:  Why do we always get the same reaction from the defenders of the Babechannels output whenever we talk about the channels being no longer worth watching. I for one, and I guess I will not be alone, when I say I don't want hard core Gonzo like porn, or "stick it in any orifice" sort of offering. Like Hawaiin Brian said in an earlier post there was nobody like Danica when it came to tease. And that is the type of performances I lament. And if the fanboys oppose what I am saying, then that just shows me how easily pleased they are. If they are satisfied with some of the girls offerings, and I won't mention names, as that would not be fair to the girls, as none of this is their doing, then so be it. But I know that my view is the right one, And I will not be shouted down by the fanboy bullyboys.

Fucking brilliant post, RA! I said I was bored of this subject a few days ago, but attitudes like this really spur me on.

The fanboys make me fucking laugh. Can't they fuck off and watch old episodes of Benny Hill to get their kicks, and allow those of us who do like ADULT material to try and get these shows back to what they were?

(15-01-2012 15:05 )Addison Wrote:  

(15-01-2012 14:33 )RESPONSIBLE ADULT Wrote:  Why do we always get the same reaction from the defenders of the Babechannels output whenever we talk about the channels being no longer worth watching [...]

It's called debate. As Reg. says, it's what happens in a forum .

But you're all missing his point, and no doubt intentionally. You all know full well what he means when he says 'same reaction from the defenders'. It's that irritating mentality from soppy fanboys who've only been watching these shows for a couple of years and have no idea how good they used to be. These fools call and text in continually, deluded and believing they have some form of meaningful relationship going on with their favourite girl. Texting in that sickening informal way they have and thinking the girl on screen actually remembers who they are when they get in touch, sending them gifts... it makes you fucking sick.

Those of us who have been watching from day one have had these shows stolen off us by these people.

Your targeting the wrong people stantheman, it's ofcom who have made the shows how they are at the moment not the babeshow fanboys. The babechannels can't do a lot of the stuff they were allowed to do in the past

Do think in a couple of years that the babeshows will all go online as they can do the sort of shows they were used to doing

No chance of that these girls use the TV exposure they get as a platform for the rest of their business and as long as the channels make money why change.

(16-01-2012 08:35 )StanTheMan Wrote:  

(15-01-2012 14:33 )RESPONSIBLE ADULT Wrote:  Why do we always get the same reaction from the defenders of the Babechannels output whenever we talk about the channels being no longer worth watching. I for one, and I guess I will not be alone, when I say I don't want hard core Gonzo like porn, or "stick it in any orifice" sort of offering. Like Hawaiin Brian said in an earlier post there was nobody like Danica when it came to tease. And that is the type of performances I lament. And if the fanboys oppose what I am saying, then that just shows me how easily pleased they are. If they are satisfied with some of the girls offerings, and I won't mention names, as that would not be fair to the girls, as none of this is their doing, then so be it. But I know that my view is the right one, And I will not be shouted down by the fanboy bullyboys.

Fucking brilliant post, RA! I said I was bored of this subject a few days ago, but attitudes like this really spur me on.

The fanboys make me fucking laugh. Can't they fuck off and watch old episodes of Benny Hill to get their kicks, and allow those of us who do like ADULT material to try and get these shows back to what they were?

(15-01-2012 15:05 )Addison Wrote:  

(15-01-2012 14:33 )RESPONSIBLE ADULT Wrote:  Why do we always get the same reaction from the defenders of the Babechannels output whenever we talk about the channels being no longer worth watching [...]

It's called debate. As Reg. says, it's what happens in a forum .

But you're all missing his point, and no doubt intentionally. You all know full well what he means when he says 'same reaction from the defenders'. It's that irritating mentality from soppy fanboys who've only been watching these shows for a couple of years and have no idea how good they used to be. These fools call and text in continually, deluded and believing they have some form of meaningful relationship going on with their favourite girl. Texting in that sickening informal way they have and thinking the girl on screen actually remembers who they are when they get in touch, sending them gifts... it makes you fucking sick.

Those of us who have been watching from day one have had these shows stolen off us by these people.

The problem with his post is that he accused everyone who disagreed with him as being a fanboy or a bully. Some of us are just casual viewers of these channels. Secondly, I'm pretty sure we'd all like the women on these channels to get naked, use toys, fuck on stage etc...It isn't going to happen unless you're prepared to pay extra money for viewing. In which case you may as well surf the Internet for free porn. On top of that some of these girls won't flash certain bits of their anatomy on stage anyway.

He wants the shows to more a bit more explicit like showing their pussy, which is fair enough. But if he doesn't get his own way he wants these channels to close down. The point is, if you don't like what you're seeing then don't watch. I can't stand Coronation street so I'll just switch the channel. Scrapping the channels altogether is worse. Something is better then nothing isn't it?

Besides, If these shows close down then forums like this will close down also. Then you and he won't be able to come here and complain about how shit these channels have became. It's not about defending the shows or being a fanboy. It's about the stupidity of his logic, that if the channels don't fit his requirements then they should be scrapped and his opinion is right and we're all fanboys if we don't agree with him.

(16-01-2012 10:00 )seth Wrote:  It's not about defending the shows or being a fanboy. It's about the stupidity of his logic, that if the channels don't fit his requirements then they should be scrapped and his opinion is right and we're all fanboys if we don't agree with him.

Well I don't think his logic is stupid. I think he's spot on. If the channels can't do any better than this then I'd be happier if they all folded tomorrow, and good riddance to them.

no he isnt cause he's blaming the babeshow fanboys for how the shows are at the moment but its ofcom why the shows are how they are

(16-01-2012 12:29 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  no he isnt cause he's blaming the babeshow fanboys for how the shows are at the moment but its ofcom why the shows are how they are

Rammyrascal is obviously right. We all know that the channels are very careful in what they do to try and avoid any problems with Ofcom.

(16-01-2012 08:35 )StanTheMan Wrote:  Those of us who have been watching from day one have had these shows stolen off us by these people.

hmmmm have you been watching from day one? cause what i remember from the early days is even softer material then it is now where you'd have girls is tiny little boxes that you could barely see, rarely flashing a tit.

Its always funny when anyone who enjoys these shows gets labeled as a 'fanboy'

You call, fanboy
text, fanboy
like what you see, fanboy
dare to post something positive, fanboy
post caps, fanboy

etc etc

Its just the easiest way for some to deal with the fact somebody can still enjoy these shows, what is wrong with that?

The funny thing about the people who always seem to be complaining about how shit everything they're seeing is, they seem to be the ones that watch night after night after night.