Dirty Site Makes Dirty Women

(30-12-2014 21:30 )ValerieC Wrote:  I didn't want anyone to know who I was because I wanted to be able to be just another person, however, after all this, I clearly have to prove myself to appease you all or I will be unable to use this forum, clearly. So, I have to verify myself, not because I want that but because otherwise I can't use this forum can I.

I'm sorry I'm not trying to gang up on anyone, but why would an American pornstar come on here in the first place? I'm sure there are many sex chat sites could go on in cognito.

If looking for for sexual fantasy why put any pics of a women up?
Why not just register as a female if you are one and pm pics of self, to guys you might get close to on here? Old trick is to show pic with head out of shot and have some users name written on arm. That way you prove you are female even if you don't want people to know your true female identity.

Quote:
So it took until now for you to receive something that was apparently sent to you 7 days ago........ Huh I'm still not buying it

Actually it took 1 day from receiving the photo as Valerie and I were not in contact for a few days

Quote:
One of only 4 people to have repped her.

What does it matter how many Reps someone gets - I myself have only a couple. I'm not on here to get praise, thanks or win awards for how great a poster I am.

Lets move this on otherwise this is just becoming repetitive and a circular argument.

The forum rules are quite clear.
All ladies are labelled as pink if they are authentic.
Don't shell out any money on people who are not labelled as pink.
Also don't try and harass any girl, (either by asking for pictures or by PM'ing them) unless they have indicated that that is their wish!

Now that Valerie Biggles has proof that this dirty woman is indeed female I'm sure the mods will be all too pleased to turn her name pink.

(09-01-2015 21:59 )biggles Wrote:  Actually it took 1 day from receiving the photo as Valerie and I were not in contact for a few days

I didn't realise you both had to be online in order for a pm/email to be sent (you do understand how the internet works, don't you?)

(09-01-2015 21:59 )biggles Wrote:  What does it matter how many Reps someone gets - I myself have only a couple. I'm not on here to get praise, thanks or win awards for how great a poster I am.

Much like VC did, you're totally missing the point I am making. I wasn't commenting on the significance of the amount of reps. I was pointing out the lack of impartiality your repping of her gives any supposed say so you come with. I'm not attacking you, I'm not having a go, simply stating an opinion. I don't have to accept any supposed proof of who she is. I have never actually asked for any. But I do not have to take your word for it either

(09-01-2015 21:59 )biggles Wrote:  What does it matter how many Reps someone gets - I myself have only a couple. I'm not on here to get praise, thanks or win awards for how great a poster I am.

I think you are missing Sooky's point. (perhaps intentionally)

Let's review the course of events from earlier in this thread;

(29-12-2014 14:35 )Bandwagon Wrote:  Easy answer, send Skully a private picture that indefinitely proves this is you. Write Skully on your tits using lip stick and send him it. He can then verify your claims and let the forum know. No pictures need to be posted so you can as you say "deny, deny, deny".

(29-12-2014 15:06 )skully Wrote:  No thanks, one of the others can take that bullet.

(few posts later by Sooky)

(30-12-2014 09:17 )biggles Wrote:  I will take one for the team. Send me your private picture I can either confirm your a hot sexy slut or someone taking the piss and this BS can be closed down.

Now perhaps foolsihly I thanked that post. While you volunteered (and admittedly no-one else raised their hand), your position wasn't exactly neutral as you've been active in the thread participating with and supporting ValerieC.

For example:

(11-12-2014 17:35 )biggles Wrote:  I'd love to make you my little fuckwhore use all those holes until they are red raw, cum and then start all other again.

and

(10-10-2014 08:21 )biggles Wrote:  ValerieC get your ass on the channels and let's see you being the horny milf with the nation wanking off over you. I'm happy to provide a private audition to see if you have what it takes to turn a real man on

and

(04-11-2014 23:27 )biggles Wrote:  seems my cum tribute wasn't allowed and got deleted by the mods. Shame I really wanted to show you how horny you make me

(I could go on, but I'm eating breakfast)

Now Skully may have not wanted to confirm things, but perhaps someone else might have been a better, impartial candidate to look at whatever was sent, especially as this was the outcome:

(07-01-2015 00:04 )biggles Wrote:  Good evening everybody.

Valerie has emailed me a photograph of HERSELF as it seems nothing other than this would stop the doubters regarding HER sexuality. It's not a picture from the web and it's not for me to distribute either. a lot of things have been said hotly in the heat of the moment which on reflection I'm sure most of us regret - lets wipe the slate clean regarding that.

Questioning who someone is or why they here should not be part of this forum and should stop hence forward, lets move the mass debate back to the theme here which I'm sure most will find more entertaining and a lot more satisfying.

I'm looking forward to the proposed chocolate mud wrestle between the gals with me as the lucky winners prize to lick them clean

Some could say this was a whitewash. Namely ...to exonerate by means of a perfunctory investigation or through biased presentation of data.

Now I could be wrong in my assertion, but I don't see any real proof other than one post by a member claiming that a picture, that we haven't seen or hasn't been verified independently by someone who doesn't want to "use all those holes until they are red raw" of the person sending the photo, proves the sender haven't been deceiving the forum by claiming they are a ex-pornstar who is...

(10-12-2014 22:07 )ValerieC Wrote:  So onely, no interest, even after all this time. Need to get used. Abused. Damaged.

(09-01-2015 21:59 )biggles Wrote:  Lets move this on otherwise this is just becoming repetitive and a circular argument.

I don't think we can move on until the central question, which Cj666 raised intitally all the way back here about whether ValerieC has been deceiving members of the forum, is fully resolved.

Perhaps Sooky's comment here is spot on about you Biggles...

(01-01-2015 12:39 )Sooky™ Wrote:  You're not doing much to persuade me you're not ValerieC

Quote:
I didn't realise you both had to be online in order for a pm/email to be sent (you do understand how the internet works, don't you?)

Yes however you do need to be online to be able to reply so if Person A sends and email on day 1 but person B doesn't read it until day 3 there is going to be a lag, especially if a reply is required.

I never said I was impartial - as quite rightly Porker has mentioned I've posted here quite a lot however my offer to validate was genuine and I would be honest about it - I could quite easily have said straight away that I'd been given validation by Valerie but what would be the point in that, perhaps I shouldn't have bothered believe what you wish.

(10-01-2015 13:08 )biggles Wrote:  I never said I was impartial - as quite rightly Porker has mentioned I've posted here quite a lot however my offer to validate was genuine and I would be honest about it - I could quite easily have said straight away that I'd been given validation by Valerie but what would be the point in that, perhaps I shouldn't have bothered believe what you wish.

No and it's that's lack of impartiality I'm calling into question, seeing as you are saying is;

"I'm not fair or impartial in this issue, but trust me anyway..EVERYTHING IS FINE, STOP QUESTIONING THE POOR LAMB VALERIEC, I HAVE THE PROOF (but can't share it) SO BELIEVE WHAT I SAY AND STOP THE QUESTIONING"

Ever since then, you've been incredibly keen to stop further scrutiny:

(07-01-2015 00:04 )biggles Wrote:  Questioning who someone is or why they here should not be part of this forum and should stop hence forward, lets move the mass debate back to the theme here which I'm sure most will find more entertaining and a lot more satisfying.

(09-01-2015 21:59 )biggles Wrote:  Lets move this on otherwise this is just becoming repetitive and a circular argument.

So I think you have something to hide. Especially, rather than address my points you, just like ValerieC argue further with Sooky. Surprise surprise.

And while Sooky is perfectly capable of addressing the points you raise, I'm curious as to why you don't debate, defend or provide any counter points to my last post.

Makes me wonder....

Alright, I'll come out and make it even clearer;

Biggles, are YOU ValerieC?

Of course I'm not Valerie.

(10-01-2015 13:08 )biggles Wrote:  I could quite easily have said straight away that I'd been given validation by Valerie

Why would that even enter your head

Unless you knew for a fact 'Valerie' wasn't going to drop you in it by saying she hadn't sent you anything......