Dirty Site Makes Dirty Women

No I was trying to say that if I wasn't being truthful I could have implied she had sent me a picture but hadn't as Sooky was commenting about the delay in receiving or commenting here about it.

(10-01-2015 14:03 )biggles Wrote:  I could have implied she had sent me a picture but hadn't

My point stands. Why would that possible course of action even enter your head (because it obviously has, as you are the one that raised it) if there was a chance 'Valerie' could drop you in it......... ?

(31-12-2014 10:33 )munch1917 Wrote:  

(31-12-2014 01:07 )RatedR Wrote:  could I ask for a breakdown of this breakdown?

It's quite wordy.

As I see it :

1. Dude comes on forum pretending to be a horny girl using porn stars pics.
2. Dumb guys get boners thinking they might get some action.
3. Guy gets called out and tries to squirm out of it by pretending to be the porn star 'undercover'.

Simples

Saddest part of the whole affair is point 2, the number of guys who fall for this kind of thing without questioning it.

I think that unless someone impartial gets evidence to prove once and for all that he/she is a women that will be pretty much the forum take on his/ her situation, regardless of biggles efforts to get the forum members to think otherwise.

The old saying what a tangled web We weave when at first we practice to deceive is the case. Valerie could well be a women who just wanted to see life through a porn starlets eyes without wanting to take the piss out of anybody but after ECJ situation (who was she by the way? Was she Blue Army?Always suspected she was but don't know and am dying to do so) and Stacey,(who I suspect was a women but not the one she was pretending to be. Please correct if know different) most members but by no means all, judging by some of the comments on this thread, are very weary of interacting with her/him, and will remain so till have concrete evidence that is not a bloke, getting their Jolly's off being spoken dirty to by various guys on the internet.

(10-01-2015 13:08 )biggles Wrote:  Quote:
I didn't realise you both had to be online in order for a pm/email to be sent (you do understand how the internet works, don't you?)

Yes however you do need to be online to be able to reply so if Person A sends and email on day 1 but person B doesn't read it until day 3 there is going to be a lag, especially if a reply is required.

The delay still doesn't make any sense:

(30-12-2014 19:26 )ValerieC Wrote:  So repeatedly offensive and condescending, had enough of it. I expect a proper apology too because it's not like I can't prove it, is it? So, when Biggles gets back to me, you'll have your answer won't you.

(31-12-2014 09:11 )biggles Wrote:  Ladies - Valerie and Sooky. This is getting out of hand a little. [rest of post here]

(01-01-2015 09:24 )biggles Wrote:  Just a side point since when on this forum has it been necessary for anyone to justify who they are or anything regarding their personal life and reasons for being on this website. [rest of post here]

(07-01-2015 00:04 )biggles Wrote:  Good evening everybody.

Valerie has emailed me a photograph of HERSELF as it seems nothing other than this would stop the doubters regarding HER sexuality. [rest of post here]

You had been on here, and posting in this very thread, on a number of occasions before finally making your 'validation' post. VC has also been online here a number of times (admittedly not posting, but you may want to familiarise yourself with the Who's online now section of the forum). So, again, why the delay?
Any other reason was dragged out for the sake of being dragged out, which in itself then raises issues.

And please don't tell me the 'proof' picture is the one here https://twitter.com/austinkincaidco

Biggles, if you still have the picture, would ValerieC be happy with one of the mods seeing it, being a neutral party to look at the picture to end this once and for all?

Just read through the posts I haven't read as not been in this thread for a couple of weeks as it became an exercise for people to try and promote themselves above other people and make themselves feel powerful, and not surprisingly that is what I see but now on Biggles. I've done all I need to do and indeed care to do, I'll go elsewhere and you can continue your psychological projection and rejection.

If you're over 65 or under 20 we should be buddies. If you're not, we can still try.

Valerie.

If you were a little more nicer to Cj666 after his post here, this all could have been avoided, Sooky, myself and others would not have interfered.

That said, this whole affair could be cleared up very quickly, if you can talk to the mods and persuade them to look at the same picture you sent to Biggles.

As moderators for the forum, they would protect your identity, confirm what Biggles has said and state the facts authoritatively.

Plus, they would change your username to pink, meaning you are absolutely, 100% verified female poster and this would end the debate.

The mods would be able to push all the other pages of debate to the Twilight Zone of the forums and you could continue posting away in this thread as if this never happened.

I would happily post a full and unreserved apology too and never question you again on this issue.

How does that sound?

(11-01-2015 05:08 )ValerieC Wrote:  Just read through the posts I haven't read as not been in this thread for a couple of weeks

That's probably the least believable thing you've written here.

(07-01-2015 00:04 )biggles Wrote:  Good evening everybody.

Valerie has emailed me a photograph of HERSELF as it seems nothing other than this would stop the doubters regarding HER sexuality. It's not a picture from the web and it's not for me to distribute either. a lot of things have been said hotly in the heat of the moment which on reflection I'm sure most of us regret - lets wipe the slate clean regarding that.

Questioning who someone is or why they here should not be part of this forum and should stop hence forward, lets move the mass debate back to the theme here which I'm sure most will find more entertaining and a lot more satisfying.

I'm looking forward to the proposed chocolate mud wrestle between the gals with me as the lucky winners prize to lick them clean

Milk or Plain ?

(09-01-2015 13:40 )setter1000 Wrote:  

(30-12-2014 21:30 )ValerieC Wrote:  I didn't want anyone to know who I was because I wanted to be able to be just another person, however, after all this, I clearly have to prove myself to appease you all or I will be unable to use this forum, clearly. So, I have to verify myself, not because I want that but because otherwise I can't use this forum can I.

I'm sorry I'm not trying to gang up on anyone, but why would an American pornstar come on here in the first place? I'm sure there are many sex chat sites could go on in cognito.

If looking for for sexual fantasy why put any pics of a women up?
Why not just register as a female if you are one and pm pics of self, to guys you might get close to on here? Old trick is to show pic with head out of shot and have some users name written on arm. That way you prove you are female even if you don't want people to know your true female identity.

Once knew a working girl called Cognito, she was a busy girl