New Rules

(14-10-2021 16:43 )southlondonphil Wrote:  

(14-10-2021 16:29 )Frenchie316 Wrote:  The other 2 channels seem normal for now, but I fear they will follow suit.

I would expect them to follow suit by midnight tonight. The line being taken appears to be that the public live streaming can no longer show full nudity.

The public live streaming? That means that Babestation 900 channel live streams can't show full nudity anymore, meaning that the actual TV sessions can't show full nudity?

I've not heard anything from Babestation, but Studio 66 have already told their girls that full nudity is off limits from now on, unless it's in private or on pervcam. Even tip goals for full nudity are not allowed anymore, so I've been told, as it would mean full nudity in public. Unless a tip goal is carried out on the understanding that if the goal is met it will be fulfilled on the pervcam.

And the other 2 channels are now doing the same, didn't take long. It's feels stupid people are having to pay even more for something that was there for years. If I request to take say Athena private (who's been a strong bearer for awesome shows over the years.) what am I going to get that I haven't seen already?! If you're going to implement a private for extra, there has to be an element of surprise, something new. GG shows I don't mind paying for to see, or hell a B/G show, seeing Vixen actually gets some D might give me a heartattack, they are in Prague after all, don't think it would hard to arrange, but one can only dream. Etherway, give me a reason to invest in it, I'm not paying for what I already know. Rant over. Does anyone see logic in my suggestion?

(14-10-2021 17:12 )Frenchie316 Wrote:  And the other 2 channels are now doing the same, didn't take long.

They didn't have long.

(14-10-2021 17:12 )Frenchie316 Wrote:  Etherway, give me a reason to invest in it, I'm not paying for what I already know. Rant over. Does anyone see logic in my suggestion?

Unfortunately logic is the one thing that is absent from a lot of punters.

They've already been paying more and more to see the same, or even less, from the very same babes who used to do it for free on even TV. Not too dissimilar to substance addiction

(14-10-2021 17:45 )KerrAvon Wrote:  

(14-10-2021 17:12 )Frenchie316 Wrote:  Etherway, give me a reason to invest in it, I'm not paying for what I already know. Rant over. Does anyone see logic in my suggestion?

Unfortunately logic is the one thing that is absent from a lot of punters.

They've already been paying more and more to see the same, or even less, from the very same babes who used to do it for free on even TV. Not too dissimilar to substance addiction

Damn, you're right. I feel pity for those who do that. More exposure is good, but at what cost, be interesting to see how the web traffic goes in the coming months after this move.

It's a good thing that I downloaded a number of clips from R_, not too long after I joined there, early this year.
Although it seems longer.. probably because it feels like a very long year.
However, I missed what might have been Olivia Berzinc and Alice fisting each other.. https://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.p...pid2606589

It was a number of months after joining R_, before I bought any credit. Of which I've barely used any.
I've since bought VIP membership for both BS and 66, but I haven't seen the point of getting it there.

"When women are on tv ('Freeview'), I don't see the point of their being knickerless. As it severely restricts the positions they can take, for the tv camera.", is something I said, only in passing, surprisingly, nearly a year ago: https://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.p...pid2516311

But that was pertaining to tv, and not a request for some bureaucratic compliance regulations, arising from an anti-porn propaganda campaign.
Restrictions have been faced down, in recent years: https://uk.news.yahoo.com/violent-porn-i...30303.html
Nonetheless, these will be more difficult to defeat.

In a nutshell, what are the new rules?

(15-10-2021 04:20 )bellissimo89 Wrote:  In a nutshell, what are the new rules?

Basically - If you want the girls on the Prague channels to take off their knickers or do any dirty stuff, then you have to go through either Perv or Private.

On the one hand, i can see that they don't want to give it out for free, but using an example of me calling.

A 30 minute call would have set me back £45 before, which is already a pricey wank to be fair.

Doing the same thing via private, plus call as i dont have a decent webcam / mic set up, would cost me £150 for the private bit plus the £45 for a call.

For the hourly rate, I could probably get a pornstar escort at that price. (Edit: Found Kerry Louise on adultwork, cheaper per hour than calling Hot and wet tv: https://www.adultwork.com/ViewProfile.asp?UserID=692406)

I just hope that the girls get to see most of the extra cash. But it won't be from me any more.