Bang media licence revoked

(30-11-2010 22:35 )bigguy01 Wrote:  banks generate their pins at random by using computers. my pin is almost like my mums pin even though i join the bank she uses years after she joined. it will work if sky gives each customer a random pin when they sign up.

They already do (it's the last four digits of your viewing card) this is set by default as you need it to watch films and some stuff on your sky+ planner during the day

i hope ofcom are watching elite tonight

(30-11-2010 23:05 )gazfc Wrote:  

(30-11-2010 22:35 )bigguy01 Wrote:  banks generate their pins at random by using computers. my pin is almost like my mums pin even though i join the bank she uses years after she joined. it will work if sky gives each customer a random pin when they sign up.

They already do (it's the last four digits of your viewing card) this is set by default as you need it to watch films and some stuff on your sky+ planner during the day

Exactly! Sky give new users a PIN that half the playground probably know how to crack. Not only your kid, but also his snotty nosed friend who comes round to play Zombie Lesbian Armageddon III on the Xbox. Imagine if your bank PIN was printed on your cashcard so a total stranger could use it. Unaceptable, no? But thats Skys idea of protecting kids. They probably say adults should change it, but frankly most adults cant work a toaster and see no need.

(30-11-2010 23:30 )bigguy01 Wrote:  i hope ofcom are watching elite tonight

Why?

(30-11-2010 19:17 )TheWatcher Wrote:  

(30-11-2010 18:03 )StanTheMan Wrote:  ~~~~
~~~~
A PIN is perfectly adequate. There are 10,000 different permitations for a four-digit PIN, so as long as it's random it's virtually impossible to guess.
~~~~
~~~~

If one million kids each had 10 random attempts at guessing a 4 digit pin, about 1000 of them would obtain access.

Please tell me this was said with tongue firmly in cheek. Otherwise I fail to see your point. Are you backing up my belief that a PIN is perfectly adequate protection, or trying to debunk it?

And you only get three guesses with a Sky PIN, so how many would be succesful now?

(01-12-2010 00:13 )astonv1 Wrote:  

(30-11-2010 23:30 )bigguy01 Wrote:  i hope ofcom are watching elite tonight

Why?

I was about to ask the same.

(30-11-2010 22:28 )RCTV Wrote:  

(30-11-2010 18:03 )StanTheMan Wrote:  

(29-11-2010 22:29 )RCTV Wrote:  Kids are far more clever than any of us ever where as kids, they can guess the pin if they really want to...

How? How can they guess it? If the parents are dim-witted enough to use birthdays, etc as the PIN, then sure the kids might guess it, but why should every adult in the country have to go without because of a few brainless parents who can't control their kids?

A PIN is perfectly adequate. There are 10,000 different permitations for a four-digit PIN, so as long as it's random it's virtually impossible to guess.

Tell you what, RCTV, if it's so easy to guess a four-digit PIN, I'll give you as long as you like to guess mine.

How about no! Wanker.

No?? But it was you who said guessing a PIN is child's play. I was hoping you was going to show us all how it's done.

(01-12-2010 00:15 )StanTheMan Wrote:  

(30-11-2010 19:17 )TheWatcher Wrote:  

(30-11-2010 18:03 )StanTheMan Wrote:  ~~~~
~~~~
A PIN is perfectly adequate. There are 10,000 different permitations for a four-digit PIN, so as long as it's random it's virtually impossible to guess.
~~~~
~~~~

If one million kids each had 10 random attempts at guessing a 4 digit pin, about 1000 of them would obtain access.

Please tell me this was said with tongue firmly in cheek. Otherwise I fail to see your point. Are you backing up my belief that a PIN is perfectly adequate protection, or trying to debunk it?

And you only get three guesses with a Sky PIN, so how many would be succesful now?

Rather than wasting energy disagreeing with ourselves cant we concentrate on what to do about Ofcom?

A PIN is fine for domestic use. Besides Ofcom say it is adequate. The reason Ofcom say it fails is that adults tell their kids the PIN. (And some tell them their bank PIN too - "type it in for mummy, oooh look at the pretty bank notes.". For what its worth I see 50% of the PINS used at Tesco too. But Ofcom say it is adequate provided you don't tell the kids. And a failure rate of 0.1% (1000/1 million) is good for this purpose.

If PINS are the stumbling point the first platform provider to introduce fingerprint recognition will be onto a winner. Or any other distinctive body part.

(01-12-2010 00:29 )eccles Wrote:  If PINS are the stumbling point the first platform provider to introduce fingerprint recognition will be onto a winner. Or any other distinctive body part.

I've been told that my swimmerets and external gills are unmistakeable, if that helps?

Missing key events. Talking bollocks. Making stuff up.
~~~SAVE THE KRILL!~~~

(02-12-2010 00:09 )Krill Liberator Wrote:  

(01-12-2010 00:29 )eccles Wrote:  If PINS are the stumbling point the first platform provider to introduce fingerprint recognition will be onto a winner. Or any other distinctive body part.

I've been told that my swimmerets and external gills are unmistakeable, if that helps?

Paw recognition that's the way to go..