ShandyHand
No Paywall Onlys - not babeshows
Posts: 3,988
Joined: Mar 2009
Reputation: 65
|
RE: Babestation Tipping & Tip Goals
(05-02-2024 13:10 )ryuken Wrote: ...It must really suck to pay for a tip goal and not see it, but punters that didn't pay for it still get to watch it for free.
BS should do something like a BBC iplayer, where you can still watch a tip goal if you've paid for it but missed seeing it.
In BS's shoes, there's three ways you could manage tip goals...
You could make all fulfilments fta-only. This would be the best option for encouraging the idea everyone benefits from goals being hit - in the same way they do from callers paying for a babe to undertake fta visuals. This giving the best encouragement to other punters to do the same in future and keep fta active. (Fta action is under definite threat atm. It needs bolstering somehow if it's to continue long-term.) If this limits some babes in what they can do for goals then all would have to bear that.*
You could make fulfilments visible only to guys that paid towards the goal. (If BS can make VIP-slated action visible only to subscribers, why wouldn't they be able to do this also?) Ryuken's idea of a (time limited) catch-up service for fulfilments would combine with this option in great fashion. This would be the fairest option to payers. (You could even refund payers who fail to see the live or catch up version of the relevant fulfilment.) Certain things here maybe too similar to Gold Shows however; stepping on the Gold's territory might seem a bad idea to BS. This option would also negate a process BS utilise very heavily - fta fulfilments teasing guys into going behind a subsequent paywall in order to get off.
Or... you could have the situation as we have it now. Notably, this is the best, most flexible, option for the babes only! Evidently, BS just don't prioritise fairness to payers.
* Note: Interestingly, self-censoring fta pussy as BS do (it's self censorship as there are other ways BS could accommodate the current regulations without banning puss on fta) makes option one less attractive to punters than it would otherwise be. Instead, it makes option three (and indeed all paywalls) artificially more attractive. IMO, the latter is a blatant manipulation of the format that should resented more widely by punters than it appears to be.
Babeshow n. - Live Adult Entertainment genre based around premium-rate phome sex chat lines. Scantily-clad female presenter induces callers and users to other inactive services from three-walled set in a TV studio. Largely softcore Tease format influenced by standards and strictures of free-to-air TV platform..
(This post was last modified: 05-02-2024 19:57 by ShandyHand.)
|
|
05-02-2024 19:50 |
|
ukusagolf
Senior Poster
Posts: 198
Joined: Jan 2019
Reputation: 4
|
RE: Babestation Tipping & Tip Goals
(05-02-2024 19:50 )ShandyHand Wrote: (05-02-2024 13:10 )ryuken Wrote: ...It must really suck to pay for a tip goal and not see it, but punters that didn't pay for it still get to watch it for free.
BS should do something like a BBC iplayer, where you can still watch a tip goal if you've paid for it but missed seeing it.
In BS's shoes, there's three ways you could manage tip goals...
You could make all fulfilments fta-only. This would be the best option for encouraging the idea everyone benefits from goals being hit - in the same way they do from callers paying for a babe to undertake fta visuals. This giving the best encouragement to other punters to do the same in future and keep fta active. (Fta action is under definite threat atm. It needs bolstering somehow if it's to continue long-term.) If this limits some babes in what they can do for goals then all would have to bear that.*
You could make fulfilments visible only to guys that paid towards the goal. (If BS can make VIP-slated action visible only to subscribers, why wouldn't they be able to do this also?) Ryuken's idea of a (time limited) catch-up service for fulfilments would combine with this option in great fashion. This would be the fairest option to payers. (You could even refund payers who fail to see the live or catch up version of the relevant fulfilment.) Certain things here maybe too similar to Gold Shows however; stepping on the Gold's territory might seem a bad idea to BS. This option would also negate a process BS utilise very heavily - fta fulfilments teasing guys into going behind a subsequent paywall in order to get off.
Or... you could have the situation as we have it now. Notably, this is the best, most flexible, option for the babes only! Evidently, BS just don't prioritise fairness to payers.
* Note: Interestingly, self-censoring fta pussy as BS do (it's self censorship as there are other ways BS could accommodate the current regulations without banning puss on fta) makes option one less attractive to punters than it would otherwise be. Instead, it makes option three (and indeed all paywalls) artificially more attractive. IMO, the latter is a blatant manipulation of the format that should resented more widely by punters than it appears to be.
You make some strong points
With the Gold Shows, you guys would know more than me. What is the reason they didn't work out?
I've only seen 3 BS Girls off the top of my head offer Gold Shows (Naya Rock, Flora Ivy, Missy LeAnne)
Sadly, too many have caved for the paywall. I've been seeing a lot of regular requests just turn into them requesting it be done in perv cam.
I can only speak with not opening my wallet, but it's not like my wallet is the most coveted one.
Some performers don't even let you know the goal is in perv cam (one even bragged about doing the goal in a private) A lot seems to depend on the goal itself. Buzz toy goals will be shown, everything else, is fair game
I stick with performers who I know will complete a tip goal. No BS private or perv request during the tip goal (there are performers who have integrity towards people who contributed to tip goals)
Give them less, they will pay more
Bring on the TARIFFS
(This post was last modified: 06-02-2024 03:01 by ukusagolf.)
|
|
06-02-2024 02:44 |
|