shankey!
Posting Machine
Posts: 2,445
Joined: Feb 2011
Reputation: 27
|
RE: New Ofcom Rules
(14-08-2011 17:04 )mr mystery Wrote: "Scottishbloke" , it was posted on this forum that channels have to satisfy a certain criteria in order to use a non UK licence , one major sticking point is that a channel using a foreign licence but broadcasting in the UK has to be based in the country that Licence it uses , a direct Ofcom quote was posted on this forum by some one were Ofcom stated that Babestation is based in the Netherlands so uses a non UK licence , in order for other company's to use a non Ofcom licence their head quarters would have to be in the country of which licence it wanted to use , this probably would not be convenient or economically viable for some of the babe channels . On another point i don't think a overseas licence will be more expensive than a UK licence , i would think they are about the same , Babesation will probably pay about the same for a licence from the country of its origin as a Uk based company will pay for their Ofcom licence . Some one once asked why Babestation doesn't have a UK licence , the answer could be that seeing as Ofcom state they are a Dutch based company they probably don't fit the criteria for being granted a UK licence in the same way that Uk company's don't fit the criteria in order to be granted a overseas licence .
Having said all that Company's such has Playboy and TVX also i believe have branches of their respective company's based in Europe , so should be able to use their non Ofcom licence's that they use to broadcast in Europe to broadcast in the UK in the same way that BS does , this overseas licence would then allow channels such as Elite who are currently using channels licenced to TVX and RLC using Playboy channels to operate with out having the fear of massive fines or getting their licence revoked and they would not be hounded to hell and back by Ofcom , but the question still is why don't they ?
why is it if babestation has such a licence the content of their show is the same as the others ,they dont go any further as far as explicitness is concerned,but then again they are never reported to my knowledge !
|
|
14-08-2011 18:18 |
|
mr mystery
Account closed by request
Posts: 5,798
Joined: Sep 2009
|
RE: New Ofcom Rules
(14-08-2011 18:35 )SYBORG666 Wrote: The score with BS is clearly the fact that they don't need to generate money from their callers because there's plenty of gullible people buying all their other products ie, pictures, videos and BSXtreme.
I agree the primary function of the BS channels nowadays is to sell the pics/vids and Xtreme , more explicit content on tv could result in a loss of revenue for these services , but lets not forget only Sky channel 906 has a Dutch licence and a couple of the freeview channels , freeview Ch 95 and 96 i believe are Dutch , the other channels BS use on Sky and freeview are leased from other company's that have a Ofcom licence , also it has been mentioned before that BS1 on Sky has a Dutch licence while BS1 Ch 94 on freeview that shows the same feed from 12am has a Ofcome licence , the same goes for BSXtra , on freeview it has a Dutch licence but on Sky Ch 910 it has a Ofcom licence , so the channels by showing the same feed on 2 different platforms nearly always one way or another are working to Ofcom guidelines , the only time BS1 is totally unregulated by Ofcom is between the hours of 9pm - 12am because at this time BS 1 isn't shown anywhere on a tv platform that is Ofcom regulated , BS 1 starts on freeview Ch 96 at 11pm this channel has a Dutch licence , at 11.30pm it goes off air on freeview to accommodate BSXtreme that goes live on CH96 , when BS1 returns to freeview at 12am it transmits from CH 94 a channel with a Ofcom licence .
Life is short . Break the rules, Forgive quickly, Kiss slowly, Love truly, Laugh uncontrollably, and never regret anything that made you smile .
(This post was last modified: 14-08-2011 19:13 by mr mystery.)
|
|
14-08-2011 19:11 |
|
StanTheMan
Banned
Posts: 3,790
Joined: May 2009
|
RE: New Ofcom Rules
(14-08-2011 18:48 )KRISB Wrote: (14-08-2011 16:33 )mrmann Wrote: So in your opinion it's impossible that any of the women have met up with their best callers? That's what you're saying?
Also, when did I ever say that women were being shagged while on their calls? The only channel that has anything close to this is the unmentionable channel.
[snip] ... The Babe channels are under extreme pressure from Ofcom. We know they have used evidence from this forum against them. Some of your postings appear to come from someone who is either very naive or an agent provacateur.
Just to jump in here. mrmann and I have suspected for many months now that live, 'out-of-shot' shagging, etc does go on - certainly on the channel that cannot be mentioned, so there's certainly no reason to think it doesn't take place on the other channels too. Just as you are doing now, KRISB, we were laughed at, ridiculed and told we had very wild imaginations.
All I will say on the matter is that I now know for certain this kind of thing does go on, but I'm not prepared to say how I know. Oh, and I'm only referring to the out-of-shot involvement here, not the suggestion that callers meet with the girls.
(This post was last modified: 14-08-2011 19:36 by StanTheMan.)
|
|
14-08-2011 19:33 |
|