New Ofcom Rules

(01-11-2011 04:43 )Scottishbloke Wrote:  Well first of all welcome back to the forum Stan

Thanks, SB

(01-11-2011 08:48 )SCIROCCO Wrote:  Amazing then you can watch people beat the living shit out of eachother, on MMA, without a hint of censorship....

You know what, it's this area of inconsistency that angers me more than anything. What kind of FUCKED up governing body considers nudity more damaging than (a lot of the time genuine) extreme violence? Yeah, let the teenage kids sit in their bedrooms watching 60 minutes of nightclub carpark fights and random street attacks caught on CCTV and mobile phones.... I mean what possible harm could come from a visual diet like that?

(01-11-2011 04:43 )Scottishbloke Wrote:  if we could get the type of shows they do on Eurotic TV for example in the not to near future then I'd be happy, I'm not expecting anything as explicit as Sexysat TV material to be shown just something that makes these shows watchable again as with the boredom they channel these days it surely couldn't be outwith the realms of possibiltys to see about Ofcom perhaps relaxing the rules to a certain degree

eccles put his finger on something when he pointed out somewhere that the shows aren't as spontaneous and fun as they used to be. As I've made clear elsewhere, I'm not one of those campaigning for more explicit material, but I would welcome a return to the days when there was a 'what's-going-to-happen-next?' vibe about the shows. Babecast, and Babestation as-was were particularly good providing what you could call live fun erotic entertainment (for other old farts like me, we could call it the adult Tiswaz or Big Breakfast model!). I'd much rather watch babes having a giggle playing topless Twister or play-wrestling in a paddling pool full of foam (supposing Health and Safety would still allow for that sort of thing) than seeing them lolling around doing little more than a lot of arch winking and lip-puckering.

Like I said Addison in a previous post, this petition is more than just wanting more explicit material to be shown as Ofcom are hell bent on sucking out all the life in them but that's another argument on a different thread which you are more than welcome to add to, but because of Ofcom regulations I very much doubt they'd even allow us to see something like topless twister as that might possibly involve the models coming into body contact with each other which is strictly a no no area under the watchable eyes of Ofcom (AKA Big Brother) until Ofcom are removed from office we'll never see a return to the fun days of liberation.

(01-11-2011 17:08 )Addison Wrote:  

(01-11-2011 04:43 )Scottishbloke Wrote:  if we could get the type of shows they do on Eurotic TV for example in the not to near future then I'd be happy, I'm not expecting anything as explicit as Sexysat TV material to be shown just something that makes these shows watchable again as with the boredom they channel these days it surely couldn't be outwith the realms of possibiltys to see about Ofcom perhaps relaxing the rules to a certain degree

eccles put his finger on something when he pointed out somewhere that the shows aren't as spontaneous and fun as they used to be. As I've made clear elsewhere, I'm not one of those campaigning for more explicit material, but I would welcome a return to the days when there was a 'what's-going-to-happen-next?' vibe about the shows. Babecast, and Babestation as-was were particularly good providing what you could call live fun erotic entertainment (for other old farts like me, we could call it the adult Tiswaz or Big Breakfast model!). I'd much rather watch babes having a giggle playing topless Twister or play-wrestling in a paddling pool full of foam (supposing Health and Safety would still allow for that sort of thing) than seeing them lolling around doing little more than a lot of arch winking and lip-puckering.

It's sad. Now when we watch these channels, all we have to look forward to is whether or not the producer will allow for "closer" angles, but even that is a rarity most of the time. One woman freaked out for a moment last night when she gave another woman a tiny brief pat on the bum

It's no wonder the calls are diminishing.

Realised today that the other thing missing, besides spontaneity, is suspense. Not knowing what will happen. The viewing being surprised. The acts are some hemmed in we know exactly what will happen when we turn on. Its like watching a football match knowing there wont be any goals.

I think one of the most irritating things we're seeing as a result of the clamp down is a return to that stupid thing the girls do when they make out like they're flicking their bean, but with their hand floating about six inches from its target, or even more ridiculous when they use two fingers to frantically rub their thigh??

Why do they do this?? If they can't do it for real, just don't do it. THE FACT THAT YOU'RE PRETENDING TO DO IT IS NOT A TURN ON!!!

(04-11-2011 03:44 )StanTheMan Wrote:  I think one of the most irritating things we're seeing as a result of the clamp down is a return to that stupid thing the girls do when they make out like they're flicking their bean, but with their hand floating about six inches from its target, or even more ridiculous when they use two fingers to frantically rub their thigh??

Why do they do this?? If they can't do it for real, just don't do it. THE FACT THAT YOU'RE PRETENDING TO DO IT IS NOT A TURN ON!!!

just thinking about some of the things i miss about how the shows not so long ago that i used to love,
charlie oneil sitting on a desk knickerless in a school uniform crossing her legs with the hint that we were going to see something
danni and lucy 241"s
jet black covered in oil
caty cole in the shower
hand panties
and of coarse the sport ,none of were any of the above anywhere near porn ,just good adult fun ,why the hell ofcom had to beat them practically with a stick to stop this kind of show will forever baffle me,bloody bastards ;(

(04-11-2011 08:30 )shankey! Wrote:  

(04-11-2011 03:44 )StanTheMan Wrote:  I think one of the most irritating things we're seeing as a result of the clamp down is a return to that stupid thing the girls do when they make out like they're flicking their bean, but with their hand floating about six inches from its target, or even more ridiculous when they use two fingers to frantically rub their thigh??

Why do they do this?? If they can't do it for real, just don't do it. THE FACT THAT YOU'RE PRETENDING TO DO IT IS NOT A TURN ON!!!

just thinking about some of the things i miss about how the shows not so long ago that i used to love,
charlie oneil sitting on a desk knickerless in a school uniform crossing her legs with the hint that we were going to see something
danni and lucy 241"s
jet black covered in oil
caty cole in the shower
hand panties
and of coarse the sport ,none of were any of the above anywhere near porn ,just good adult fun ,why the hell ofcom had to beat them practically with a stick to stop this kind of show will forever baffle me,bloody bastards ;(

Oh Jet was so horny. Absolutely fantastic. I have more or less stopped watching the channels now and when I do have a flick through (if you'll pardon the expression) I particularly hate those ghastly twins on Babe Station (?) with their vacuous expressions, dreadful boob jobs and simpering voices. Truly dreadful. Yuk!

(04-11-2011 03:44 )StanTheMan Wrote:  I think one of the most irritating things we're seeing as a result of the clamp down is a return to that stupid thing the girls do when they make out like they're flicking their bean, but with their hand floating about six inches from its target, or even more ridiculous when they use two fingers to frantically rub their thigh??

Why do they do this?? If they can't do it for real, just don't do it. THE FACT THAT YOU'RE PRETENDING TO DO IT IS NOT A TURN ON!!!

Worse than that, it might happen but technically even pretending to flick the bean is banned. The guidelines state "Adult chat broadcasters should: ... at no time broadcast images of any real or simulated sex acts (these include vaginal or anal intercourse, masturbation, fellatio or cunnilingus);".

They also ban almost any use of any liquid (except drinking urine) "at no time include shots of presenters spitting onto their or others‟ bodies, or include shots of presenters using other liquids, such as oil and lotions, on their genital or anal areas." and "at no time broadcast shots of presenters using liquids of a sort or in a way which suggests the liquid is ejaculate;"

and 241s "should take particular care if two or more presenters appear together on screen. If there is any contact between the presenters of an erotic or sexual nature (for example kissing, stroking, or contact between thighs, breasts or genital areas) or any miming or simulation of a sexual act performed by one presenter on another"

explicit language is also banned on babeshows "at no time broadcast sexually explicit language"

but day time tele can broadcast Warwick Davies on Loose Women (or was it The One Show?) describing how he pops out a toilet bowl when Daniel Craig is about to have a slash, and the female presenter says every woman "would love to swop places". Swop places and experience what? Being face height with his clothed cock? Or unzipped? Or experience a golden shower? No really something most Mums would want to explain to a 5 year old.

just about says it all ,its not if but when they all cease to broadcast,i mean you might as well watch the ceiling spinning after the pub closes !