Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 10 Vote(s) - 2.7 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity

Author Message
StanTheMan Offline
Banned

Posts: 3,790
Joined: May 2009
Post: #351
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity
I've said this in another thread, but I seriously urge anyone who hasn't seen this to get themselves a copy - beg, borrow, steal... just get a copy. As an extra, it contains the documentary VIDEO NASTIES: MORAL PANIC, CENSORSHIP AND VIDEOTAPE and it reflects exactly what we're seeing happening with Ofcom right now. We need another hero like Martin Barker to come along and fight our corner.

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Video-Nasties-De...477&sr=8-2
16-11-2011 19:12
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
eccles Offline
custodes qui custodiet
*****

Posts: 3,032
Joined: May 2010
Reputation: 69
Post: #352
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity
If you knew where to look there were spells when the BBC used to have regular posh porn, buried in satire and arts shows that plebs wouldnt watch. ITV had spells of reliable shows including Benny Hill (at 8pm for fucks sake!) and OTT. Channel 4 tried late night clubber shows with Denise van Outen in a rubber cat suit and young women having to identify their b/f cock from a line up, but being C4 they dropped the concept after a year to reach some other neglected group. One film in a few years doesnt really compare.

Gone fishing
17-11-2011 01:34
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
mrmann Offline
Posting Machine
*****

Posts: 15,880
Joined: May 2009
Reputation: 92
Post: #353
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity
Joy of teen sex is on 104 right now, and a young woman came in to talk about her sensitive clit. The doctor had a look at it, EVERYTHING was shown! Open leg vagina with no censorship, and this is just after ten! Sure it might be educational, sort of, but damn if I wasn't turned on. Either way, isn't this against the rules seeing how it's not 11pm yet?
17-11-2011 22:15
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
dix Offline
Junior Poster
**

Posts: 58
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation: 11
Post: #354
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity
(17-11-2011 22:15 )mrmann Wrote:  Joy of teen sex is on 104 right now, and a young woman came in to talk about her sensitive clit. The doctor had a look at it, EVERYTHING was shown! Open leg vagina with no censorship, and this is just after ten! Sure it might be educational, sort of, but damn if I wasn't turned on. Either way, isn't this against the rules seeing how it's not 11pm yet?

It's amazing isn't it? Ofcom say its ok to show pussy on channel 4 at a time when kids are watching. Yet it's not allowed on adult channels
17-11-2011 23:29
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
arron88 Offline
Junior Poster
**

Posts: 84
Joined: Sep 2008
Reputation: 4
Post: #355
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity
(17-11-2011 22:15 )mrmann Wrote:  Either way, isn't this against the rules seeing how it's not 11pm yet?
What rule is that then? Sorry I didn't hear about it.
17-11-2011 23:31
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
continental19 Offline
Posting Machine
*****

Posts: 1,260
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation: 38
Post: #356
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity
Yea good post Dix I agree, the fact they say it's under the educational cover to me is splitting hairs to say the least, and yet dedicated Adult channels can't get naked till 11pm, and you can forget about showing any pussy, well Ofcom deem that offensive? What a load of Bollocks, maybe the Adult channels should brand themselves medical channels instead, well it can't do them any harm.
17-11-2011 23:38
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
StanTheMan Offline
Banned

Posts: 3,790
Joined: May 2009
Post: #357
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity
(17-11-2011 23:38 )continental19 Wrote:  Yea good post Dix I agree, the fact they say it's under the educational cover to me is splitting hairs to say the least...

Big Laugh Pun intended or not?

Joking aside, if any more proof were needed that Ofcom are single-handily operating to run the babeshows out of business, here it is. Blatant double standards at it's very worst. Yes, they can hide behind the context clause, but quite frankly it's as transparent as glass.
18-11-2011 00:42
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
continental19 Offline
Posting Machine
*****

Posts: 1,260
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation: 38
Post: #358
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity
True Stan I hear what you're saying mate and completely agree with you entirely.
(This post was last modified: 18-11-2011 00:46 by continental19.)
18-11-2011 00:45
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
mrmann Offline
Posting Machine
*****

Posts: 15,880
Joined: May 2009
Reputation: 92
Post: #359
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity
Also, later in the show, anal sex was covered, and one of the hosts went to visit a man and a woman doing a porn shoot, to which the woman's vagina was shown open leg while she spoke to the host and not censored. Ofcom is a confused organization.

Rolleyes

Ben Dover also had a cameo, and offered the host ten grand to do anal, to which she looked quite turned off!
(This post was last modified: 18-11-2011 00:57 by mrmann.)
18-11-2011 00:51
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
StanTheMan Offline
Banned

Posts: 3,790
Joined: May 2009
Post: #360
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity
(18-11-2011 00:51 )mrmann Wrote:  Ofcom is a confused organization.

I don't think they're confused at all. I think they know exactly what they're doing bladewave
(This post was last modified: 18-11-2011 01:09 by StanTheMan.)
18-11-2011 01:09
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply