The Psychology of the Spend

Lol. You're a joker. The only agenda I ever prescribe to on this forum is to stand up for better services on the shows.

Please tell me two things: One, where have I ever said guys haven't been wanking since there was men? (This was entirely something you brought up.) And two how is what I've said dangerous exactly?

Let me be ultra clear, my o.p. was not proposing everyone thinks in the exact regimented pattern described above (the post stated this); nor was I suggesting any requirement to do so. Instead it was simply my best distillation of the basic factors involved (as stated time and time again by punters on this forum for instance). This thread's purpose was to re-present them in their most logical structure; as a frame of reference to make it easier to offer further generalised or personalised commentary on the subject. The fact that you refuse to see this simple intent makes me suspicious of your motives tbh.

(23-01-2021 13:58 )ShandyHand Wrote:  Lol. You're a joker. The only agenda I ever prescribe to on this forum is to stand up for better services on the shows.

Please tell me two things: One, where have I ever said guys haven't been wanking since there was men? (This was entirely something you brought up.) And two how is what I've said dangerous exactly?

Let me be ultra clear, my o.p. was not proposing everyone thinks in the exact regimented pattern described above (the post stated this); nor was I suggesting any requirement to do so. Instead it was simply my best distillation of the basic factors involved (as stated time and time again by punters on this forum for instance). This thread's purpose was to re-present them in their most logical structure; as a frame of reference to make it easier to offer further generalised or personalised commentary on the subject. The fact that you refuse to see this simple intent makes me suspicious of your motives tbh.

You can be suspicious all you want, I'm already very wary of your posts.

The channels are for wanking, wanking has been going on since time immemorial. You seem to be trying to infuse the whole process with some magic, some allure, which does not exist. Get off your high horse.

Not even acknowledging either of my queries to you I see. Never has this forum been in greater need of a shrugs emoji.

(23-01-2021 15:35 )ShandyHand Wrote:  Not even acknowledging either of my queries to you I see. Never has this forum been in greater need of a shrugs emoji.

I was thinking about that we do need some new emojis skully get on this mate

Okaaaay!

Hiya all just been reading these messages I can see in where your all coming from yes people use to get drunk get food go home flick through the adult channels and phone up it's a fantasy call a quick relief for some. But its changed from that I feel if the channels can get away in paying for the service these girls do on a daily basis then they will try there best to do so. They need babes that are easy to talk with as the longer a person is on the phone the more money it brings in weather it's from topping up with n credits or using the main phone number. We are in very different times how many times have everyone seen a babe on call for 20 minutes without nothing happening unless someone buzzes her while on call. Yes men and women have been wanking since day dot here another thing u need to think about while on this subject. Every hand u touch or shake has had a cock in it. I know this is a forum for decision on babe shows and girls we do have a choice in weather we spend big or not weather we surport a favourite girl or girls but at the end of the day the studio is the only winner it's like going to the casino. U go to have a great time forget about what's going on for awhile. The babes do there shows and add bits to it so they don't become boring but remember they can only do so much in these stragne times. At the end of the day the babes will bend over backwards for fans that help them get there daily target weather it's in calls tipping buzzes pervcam or private cam and they also know that people can't keep putting in loads of money so if u tell Ur favourite girl in chatbox but still do a shorter call or a tip they will appreciate it just as much because u are still helping them. How's this all works is down to us without us there's no babe channels then it only ppv in what some channels are thinking of doing unless a person has credit they won't be able to go backstage. Which we hurt both fans and babes because if Ur paying credits to be in that show unless u got stacked of money u not going to do anything else except watch
From Dazzler

(23-01-2021 14:44 )Nadam Wrote:  

(23-01-2021 13:58 )ShandyHand Wrote:  Lol. You're a joker. The only agenda I ever prescribe to on this forum is to stand up for better services on the shows.

Please tell me two things: One, where have I ever said guys haven't been wanking since there was men? (This was entirely something you brought up.) And two how is what I've said dangerous exactly?

Let me be ultra clear, my o.p. was not proposing everyone thinks in the exact regimented pattern described above (the post stated this); nor was I suggesting any requirement to do so. Instead it was simply my best distillation of the basic factors involved (as stated time and time again by punters on this forum for instance). This thread's purpose was to re-present them in their most logical structure; as a frame of reference to make it easier to offer further generalised or personalised commentary on the subject. The fact that you refuse to see this simple intent makes me suspicious of your motives tbh.

You can be suspicious all you want, I'm already very wary of your posts.

The channels are for wanking, wanking has been going on since time immemorial. You seem to be trying to infuse the whole process with some magic, some allure, which does not exist. Get off your high horse.

I didn't say that you hadn't said that about wanking mate. It was more backing up my point than anything.

It's dangerous because you're way over analysing the channels and taking all of the fun out of them.

For most people it's just material for a quick ham shank shuffle shandy. For others it's just a chance to get a bit of company on the end of the phone.

In summary I feel you are way over thinking this and that's where the Garth Crooks reference came in. He tended to ask rambling questions without really getting to the point.

Over-analysing, eh?

https://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.php?tid=80491

(24-01-2021 08:49 )Nadam Wrote:  It's dangerous because you're way over analysing the channels and taking all of the fun out of them.

Football is just 22 grown men kicking a ball around for 90 minutes and for no material reason. We can still over-analyse the hell out of that. We talk about it endlessly, fight in the streets over it, write government policy about it, build businesses around it, and create academic departments in universities just to study it all. But none of that takes the fun out of watching 22 grown men kick a ball around for 90 minutes.

Of course the babeshows are just about horny guys having a wank. So what if Shandy wants to take some time out from all the wanking to ask some sociological questions about it? I really don’t see what the “danger” is.

In fact, it’s for all the reasons you’ve mentioned that it’s a question worth asking. We’ve been doing it since the cave. It’s physiological and it’s free. We know how to do it, it’s the same every time, and we can do it whenever we want, without ever paying a penny. And yet there are some of us who — for various reasons — choose to pay (sometimes exorbitant amounts ) for it anyway. The senselessness of it alone makes it an interesting question.

I think my primal horniness will survive Shandy’s harmless academic curiosity.

(24-01-2021 09:20 )Rake Wrote:  Over-analysing, eh?

https://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.php?tid=80491

Great work Lieutenant Columbo! That thread is about folk being ripped off by the channels though, two completely different things.

Well done though.